Dragon Age: Inquisition Interview
-
Category: News ArchiveHits: 1827
RPS: You were discussing all the potential repercussions for choices. You were saying that it's very possible for content to be blocked off if you make certain choices.
Laidlaw: Absolutely.
RPS: How much of the game functions that way? If a player goes through and only plays once, roughly how much will they. I don't want to say (miss out on,) but the nature of choice being what it is, making a real impactful choice, how much could that close off?
Laidlaw: I couldn't say at this point. I think that's something we need to be closer to final to lock down. But our goal is that it's a significant amount, a fifth or a quarter or so, that's showing some degree of exclusivity. And then you can layer on top of that a certain amount of stuff that you probably just won't find. (Oh, you didn't go east there. Wow. Well, you missed out on the big dragon carcass or what have you.) That kind of stuff is good.
I think that our goal, more than worrying about percentages, is that when I present a choice, or when my team presents a choice, to a player, our goal with Inquisition is that we honor that choice. This goes all the way to, (What are you importing into the world?) If it's something that we're going to tackle at all, I want it to be significantly different.
Similarly, if you make a choice where it's, (Well, you're going to have to side with one of these two groups,) or (Either that guy's gonna die or that guy's gonna die,) or anything that's on that level, I would hate for a character to just say (Thanks!) and you're done. Instead, we want it to have more depth than that. More than worrying about the numbers, it's about a philosophy. It's something we're really working really hard on, to make sure that we either honor the choice or get rid of it. Sometimes you simply have to, because the ramifications are too big. But more often than not it's just finding a good and interesting and satisfying way to say, (Yeah, that matters. I see how.)
