Please note that new user registrations disabled at this time.

Advice on a new camera

Anything goes... just keep it clean.
Post Reply
User avatar
Minerva
Posts: 4992
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2000 11:00 pm
Location: Somewhere beyond the sea
Contact:

Advice on a new camera

Post by Minerva »

In order to win the competition, I decided to buy a new camera. :D :p

Seriously, I'm using a 13 years old camera at the moment (Made in Japan, so it's really well built. What else do you expect?). It's auto focus with 105mm lense, and has been doing a great job all over the world (except in the "New World". I have no plan to travel beyond the Atlantic nor the Pacific at the moment).

However, I'd like take it a bit more seriously, and want a new camera which is not too... well, touristy camera. I've been also considering to get a digital camera instead (can't afford both :( ), to make it easier to place on our website (for my research place). I am not sure if I should buy a camera and made it available on CDs when I develop films, or buy a digital camera and print them when I need.

I am going to Japan from next week, and hoping to buy one (budget permitting) while I'll be there. Much cheaper than UK without VAT and more recent models available there.

Any advice welcomed. :)
"Strength without wisdom falls by its own weight."

A word to the wise is sufficient
Minerva (Semi-retired SYMer)
User avatar
Phantom Lord
Posts: 877
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2001 10:00 pm
Location: Exiled - yet ...
Contact:

Post by Phantom Lord »

Difficult question - it depends a lot on what you want to do with it.

Good conventional cameras produce the highest quality and you can scan your photos afterwards. A good scan from a good photo is better than anything an affordable digicam can produce. Advantage: Superior quality. Problems: You'll need the scanner and much time, plus developing photos costs money.

Digital cameras are great for all kind of snapshots, they're small and have little weight. Advantage: No developing costs, have your photos as data without work. Problems: You don't have a normal photo, making or printing one is expensive.

Third alternative: Digital camcorder. Nothing is better for moving targets - you can pick fotos out the movie, allowing you much easier to capture things that would otherwise require perfect timing. Advantage: Record tons of stuff in motion and capture single images later. Problems: Like digicam plus high price.

So far I had positive experience with following brands:

Conventional photo: Minolta, Pentax
Scanner: Canon
Digicam: Canon
Camcorder: Sony
User avatar
Minerva
Posts: 4992
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2000 11:00 pm
Location: Somewhere beyond the sea
Contact:

Post by Minerva »

Thanks. :)

I'm leaning towards conventional camera (SLT?) than digital camera, because I want enjoy photographing. I've already got a scanner, which is hardly used :o , so that's not a problem.
"Strength without wisdom falls by its own weight."

A word to the wise is sufficient
Minerva (Semi-retired SYMer)
User avatar
dragon wench
Posts: 19609
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2001 10:00 pm
Location: The maelstrom where chaos merges with lucidity
Contact:

Post by dragon wench »

I have used an old Olympus, manual, camera for years...it is really excellent ! I also have experience with other Olympus equipement..and I would highly recommend their stuff.
Spoiler
testingtest12
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
Spoiler
testingtest12
.......All those moments ... will be lost ... in time ... like tears in rain.
User avatar
Osiris
Posts: 845
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2000 11:00 pm
Location: The Underworld
Contact:

Post by Osiris »

I have used an old Canon SLR for some years, with a range of interchangeable lenses and filters for different purposes. I've had no problems and a lot of fun with this gear (good photos too). You can check out their stuff here.

If you want to go upmarket, Hasselblad is probably the best, but are really costly, and are mainly used by professionals. :cool:
Post Reply