spiderman

Ned Flanders · Post by **Ned Flanders** » Mon May 06, 2002 9:31 am

CM,

Lucas has already said this one is much better. He's pleased with the product more so than the phantom menace. That movie was tough because it was tough to accept a kid as the hero.

HighLordDave · Post by **HighLordDave** » Mon May 06, 2002 9:40 am

Originally posted by Ned Flanders
That movie was tough because it was tough to accept a kid as the hero.

No, TPM was bad because George was obsessed with eye candy instead of the story, Jar Jar Binks and because the movie lacked a compelling villain.

Ned Flanders · Post by **Ned Flanders** » Mon May 06, 2002 10:02 am

Yes HLD, those things included as well. Jar Jar was awful, and darth maul was nonexistant. The kid hero bothered me the most and Lucas actually addressed that issue as a problem with the movie. I don't know how easy it will be trying to retrieve that article but I can look for it.

Vivien · Post by **Vivien** » Mon May 06, 2002 10:06 am

Back to spider man...

I saw it friday and loved it

It had a decent plot, nice action, a few good characters...but the truth is I liked it because I found spider man's agility to be extremely sexy...

Georgi · Post by **Georgi** » Mon May 06, 2002 10:10 am

Originally posted by Ned Flanders
That movie was tough because it was tough to accept a kid as the hero.

Two words: Harry Potter

Loads of movies have a kid as the hero. Jake Lloyd is just the wrong kid. Plus all that other stuff wrong with TPM.

HighLordDave · Post by **HighLordDave** » Mon May 06, 2002 10:37 am

Originally posted by Vivien
but the truth is I liked it because I found spider man's agility to be extremely sexy...

It's the suit, isn't it?

::Scribbles production notes to self about getting McBane fitted for spandex superhero outfit::

HighLordDave · Post by **HighLordDave** » Mon May 06, 2002 10:42 am

Another one of my gripes with Spider-Man is that they overdid the "Peter Parker is a geek" angle. He's always been a great protagonist because he had everyday teenager problems: dating, zits, social maladjustment, etc. However, I never got the feeling from the comic books that he was bullied or otherwise at the bottom of the social coolness ladder.

In the movie, I think they harped too much on the whole, "Peter is so put upon because he's such a nerd that even the bus driver piles on whenever given the opportunity". I thought that he still could have been sympathetic without being pathetic.

CM · Post by CM » Mon May 06, 2002 10:48 am

Hey don't spoil it for me!!!
And those who haven't seen it!

Kayless · Post by **Kayless** » Mon May 06, 2002 11:20 am

Originally posted by Geckopat
his glider is really cool man. wish i had 1.

LOL

Me too. Reminds me of the new Simpsons episode last night. Homer has a fantasy where he's flying in a hang-glider and shotting lasers and the people below. "You can run, but you can't GLIDE! Hahaha!!!"

evelbruce · Post by **evelbruce** » Mon May 06, 2002 1:41 pm

I saw it and thought it was great!!! It was the best adaptation of a comic book that i'd ever seen in a movie. Yes, some things were different but the character portrayals were perfect, you have to remember that this is about 20years of Spidey roled into 1 movie. Peter Parker has to be wimpy like he was with Gwen Stacey, not confident like he was with MJ. So it was very hard to pull it off, but overall it was a great job. It is worth seeing ,for anybody that's wondering. I am looking forward to Star Wars, but I don't think it will make as much as Spiderman.

Vivien · Post by **Vivien** » Mon May 06, 2002 1:44 pm

Originally posted by HighLordDave

It's the suit, isn't it?

::Scribbles production notes to self about getting McBane fitted for spandex superhero outfit::

ROFL!!! Well...the mask is rather sexy I guess

Georgi · Post by **Georgi** » Mon May 06, 2002 4:08 pm

Originally posted by CM
Hey don't spoil it for me!!!

Well don't read a thread about what people thought of the movie!!

Tamerlane · Post by **Tamerlane** » Mon May 06, 2002 7:19 pm

Originally posted by Georgi
Two words: Harry Potter

Hey there is nothing wrong with Harry Potter.

You just have to accept that there are certain situations where incredibly young children will be able to out smart their much older and wiser counterparts.

Geckopat · Post by **Geckopat** » Mon May 06, 2002 11:02 pm

Originally posted by Kayless

LOL Me too. Reminds me of the new Simpsons episode last night. Homer has a fantasy where he's flying in a hang-glider and shotting lasers and the people below. "You can run, but you can't GLIDE! Hahaha!!!"

hahahah.......
i never get to see that episode from simpsons.
well if i hav the glider. my lecturers are definately gonna pay...

Georgi · Post by **Georgi** » Tue May 07, 2002 4:01 am

Originally posted by Tamerlane
Hey there is nothing wrong with Harry Potter.

I never said there was

My point was that the hero in HP is a kid, and that didn't make it a bad film.

Robnark · Post by **Robnark** » Tue May 07, 2002 4:05 am

Originally posted by Georgi
Loads of movies have a kid as the hero

there are also loads of bad films...

coincidence?

I think not!

CM · Post by CM » Tue May 07, 2002 4:07 am

Originally posted by Robnark

there are also loads of bad films...

coincidence?

I think not!

LMAORRFL!!!!!!!!!

Georgi · Post by **Georgi** » Tue May 07, 2002 4:13 am

Originally posted by Robnark
there are also loads of bad films...

coincidence?

I think not!

ROFL

I think there are plenty of bad films without a kid as the hero

Just look at 8mm (or don't!)

Though having a kid as the hero does usually mean the movie is aimed mainly at kids... Maybe it was a marketing ploy by George Lucas. He knew all the adults would go to see TPM because Star Wars was part of their childhood, so making a kid the hero was trying to sell it to kids who don't remember the originals. Hmmm. Anyway, on reflection I guess it's true, Obi-Wan and Qui-Gonn should have been the heroes in TPM, not the brat.

Stilgar · Post by **Stilgar** » Tue May 07, 2002 6:18 am

Originally posted by Georgi

I think there are plenty of bad films without a kid as the hero Just look at 8mm (or don't!)

Though having a kid as the hero does usually mean the movie is aimed mainly at kids... Maybe it was a marketing ploy by George Lucas. He knew all the adults would go to see TPM because Star Wars was part of their childhood, so making a kid the hero was trying to sell it to kids who don't remember the originals. Hmmm. Anyway, on reflection I guess it's true, Obi-Wan and Qui-Gonn should have been the heroes in TPM, not the brat.

8MM wasn't that bad a movie, just avarage.
If you want to see a lousy movie see "young einstein"

And you're right about Anakin, he stole the glory of obi and qui-gonn.

Mr Sleep · Post by **Mr Sleep** » Tue May 07, 2002 6:29 am

Originally posted by Georgi
Maybe it was a marketing ploy by George Lucas. He knew all the adults would go to see TPM because Star Wars was part of their childhood, so making a kid the hero was trying to sell it to kids who don't remember the originals. Hmmm. Anyway, on reflection I guess it's true, Obi-Wan and Qui-Gonn should have been the heroes in TPM, not the brat.

You think Lucas had any plan with TPM, i would be greatly surprised

In attack of the clones we are going to have an adolescent instead, which will be worse i wonder