Please note that new user registrations disabled at this time.

Video card - can someone help?

If you have technical questions regarding computers, consoles, or the games we play on them, post them in here.
User avatar
Luis Antonio
Posts: 9103
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 11:00 am
Location: In the home of the demoted.
Contact:

Video card - can someone help?

Post by Luis Antonio »

Ok, after years of waiting I've decided to buy a new video card. But, as everything in Brazil, it is extremely taxed by the government, so I on my comparison of prices, three models came to my mind:

First this: ATI Radeon 9550 Which seems to be my best choice in price.

Then, this one:
6600q. This one seems the harder to find here, but it is 50% more expensive than the previous GPU.

The last one:
FX 5700 Which is an average choice between the other cards.

I want a video card to play well for at least two years. My Geforce 3 64 mb has 3 years already, its completely outdated, and even though its a very good video card it hasnt support for many features in the games that I want to run. For example, I've bought doom 3 and I dont know how is it to play it without the frame -by frame animations in certain lightning exausting parts of the game, even though I'm playing it at minimum specs.

My PC is an Athlon 2600+, with 528 Mb Ram, I have an Asus motherboard 7x9xnx series (or something like it) and onboard sound.

Thoughts?
Flesh to stone ain't permanent, it seems.
User avatar
Ravager
Posts: 22464
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 1:50 pm

Post by Ravager »

I own an FX5700. A Gainward version. It's good but I'm not sure it'll last me 2 years. Graphics cards are probably one of the things I change the most.

I wouldn't buy anything that's low in one of the Nvidia card series. Probably something in the 6000 series is better like the 6600 you mentioned there.

I think the general rule is to either buy something new mid-range or something old thats top of the range. Some people have made Geforce Ti cards last a long while.

IIRC the ATI card you mentioned is supposed to be very good but I've stuck with Nvidia for a while now.

I'll see if I can find some reasonable priced UK versions which you could look for equivalents of :) . The Gainward 6600's seem to be the cheapest (I didn't see the Albatross one) and Gainward products are generally good quality.
User avatar
dragon wench
Posts: 19609
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2001 10:00 pm
Location: The maelstrom where chaos merges with lucidity
Contact:

Post by dragon wench »

I suspect that there could be many reasons at play, but we have had huge problems trying to switch our son's computer over to an ATI card from an Nvidia one. Apparently, this can occasionally happen in a small number of cases. Looks like we got lucky :rolleyes:

Something to bear in mind at any rate.
Spoiler
testingtest12
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
Spoiler
testingtest12
.......All those moments ... will be lost ... in time ... like tears in rain.
User avatar
Luis Antonio
Posts: 9103
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 11:00 am
Location: In the home of the demoted.
Contact:

Post by Luis Antonio »

Well, I'm going to be the owner of the ATI. Hope I do not have the problems you had, DW. The good thing is that I'm excited about having real power on my machine :D
Flesh to stone ain't permanent, it seems.
User avatar
Rookierookie
Posts: 1253
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 2:22 am
Contact:

Post by Rookierookie »

Maybe a little late, but IMO it's a little unfair to compare the Radeon 9550 and Geforce 5700 with the Geforce 6600, because the last one is twice as fast as the 9550, and ~60% faster than the 5700.
User avatar
Luis Antonio
Posts: 9103
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 11:00 am
Location: In the home of the demoted.
Contact:

Post by Luis Antonio »

But, unfortunately, they're 60% more expensive than they should be. Comparing the dolar and the Reais price, I came to the conclusion that the cards are too expensive here, while the 9550 is not... also, my "former" video card is a GeForce 4, so I guess anyway I'll be giving a GIANT step...

(today it must arrive :D )
Flesh to stone ain't permanent, it seems.
User avatar
Rookierookie
Posts: 1253
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 2:22 am
Contact:

Post by Rookierookie »

That depends on which Geforce 4 it is. The Radeon 9550 is only a little faster than the Geforce 4 Ti.
User avatar
Luis Antonio
Posts: 9103
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 11:00 am
Location: In the home of the demoted.
Contact:

Post by Luis Antonio »

Ge force 4 mx 64 mb ;)
Flesh to stone ain't permanent, it seems.
User avatar
Ravager
Posts: 22464
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 1:50 pm

Post by Ravager »

Which MX? I used to have an MX440 before upgrading that to the 5700.

Hope the new card works well. :)
User avatar
Luis Antonio
Posts: 9103
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 11:00 am
Location: In the home of the demoted.
Contact:

Post by Luis Antonio »

440 :D Very reliable, but the lack of Ram makes it very outdated.
Flesh to stone ain't permanent, it seems.
User avatar
Luis Antonio
Posts: 9103
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 11:00 am
Location: In the home of the demoted.
Contact:

Post by Luis Antonio »

The new card arrived, a 9550, rather good, fine to play doom 3, unreal 2 and morrowind. I'm pretty satisfied. It runs NFSU too, and damn, it is very good. The card doesnt have problems with heating (I dont want to need to buy a water cooler, for example) and it gave me some extra depht in colors.

Oh how could I live without graphic power?
Flesh to stone ain't permanent, it seems.
User avatar
Ravager
Posts: 22464
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 1:50 pm

Post by Ravager »

Out of curosity, is it a fan or a heatsink on that?

Glad it works well. :)

Just wait for all the driver issues graphics cards always seem to have... :rolleyes: ;)
User avatar
Luis Antonio
Posts: 9103
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 11:00 am
Location: In the home of the demoted.
Contact:

Post by Luis Antonio »

Its a Fan. I prefer fans to heatsinks. And it is a very quiet fan, what makes me even more proud :D I hate when you have tons of fans making that whirrrrr noise all day long.
Flesh to stone ain't permanent, it seems.
User avatar
Rookierookie
Posts: 1253
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 2:22 am
Contact:

Post by Rookierookie »

I don't think any graphics card has ever required water cooling.

If you aren't worried about overheating, you can try overclocking the card. The Radeon 9550 is one of the most overclockable cards ever made, and is nearly twice as fast as normal when clocked to the max.
User avatar
Luis Antonio
Posts: 9103
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 11:00 am
Location: In the home of the demoted.
Contact:

Post by Luis Antonio »

oh I dont mean for the graphic card, I meant for the whole CPU. Athlons have a tendency to be "hotter" than pentiums when it comes to playing demanding games. So the water cooling would be for the Mobo and the case.

Heheh not so fast, I'm trying to learn how to be the owner of the card first, overclock later :D
Flesh to stone ain't permanent, it seems.
User avatar
SyntheticD
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 12:33 am
Location: City Of Industry, CA
Contact:

Post by SyntheticD »

[QUOTE=Luis Antonio]Ok, after years of waiting I've decided to buy a new video card. But, as everything in Brazil, it is extremely taxed by the government, so I on my comparison of prices, three models came to my mind:

First this: ATI Radeon 9550 Which seems to be my best choice in price.

Then, this one:
6600q. This one seems the harder to find here, but it is 50% more expensive than the previous GPU.

The last one:
FX 5700 Which is an average choice between the other cards.

I want a video card to play well for at least two years. My Geforce 3 64 mb has 3 years already, its completely outdated, and even though its a very good video card it hasnt support for many features in the games that I want to run. For example, I've bought doom 3 and I dont know how is it to play it without the frame -by frame animations in certain lightning exausting parts of the game, even though I'm playing it at minimum specs.

My PC is an Athlon 2600+, with 528 Mb Ram, I have an Asus motherboard 7x9xnx series (or something like it) and onboard sound.

Thoughts?[/QUOTE]



go with the latest and greatist tech if you have the money due to the constant change of technology it will last longer
"That is not dead which can eternal lie / And with strange aeons even death may die."
H.P. Lovecraft
Quoting the Necronomicon, in "The Nameless City"

Giuld Wars Guild [url="http://www.freewebs.com/the_divisors/"]http://www.freewebs.com/the_divisors/[/url]
User avatar
Hill-Shatar
Posts: 7724
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 1:41 am
Location: Hell Freezing Over
Contact:

Post by Hill-Shatar »

The latest is not always the best. Oftentimes I have found that some of the cheaper, non-brand names items work better.

I don't know what Luis is going to do with it, but my guess is some RPGing, considering the forums that he constantly posts in. He may want to get some of the semi newer stuff, but his system wont be overly taxed in itself by RPGs. Action RPGs on the other hand, will utterly destroy some older types of video cards.

Basically, find a nice balance between cost, compatibility and design if you want to get something you really need. Luis is a student I believe, which lowers his basic income. I have more money to spend then he does, which is saying something. :D

Basically, you can get the newest graphics card, but if he doesnt have the newer computers, then it will be nearly incompatible. Also, the newest stuff on the shelf usually has some bugs or design flaws that will be repaired in the next version.
Buy a GameBanshee T-Shirt [url="http://www.gamebanshee.com/forums/showthread.php?t=68975"]HERE[/url]! Sabre's [url="http://www.users.bigpond.com/qtnt/index.htm"]site[/url] for Baldur's Gate series' patches and items. This has been a Drive-by Hilling.
User avatar
Ravager
Posts: 22464
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 1:50 pm

Post by Ravager »

Particularly in the case of Nvidia, avoid their entry cards whether they're new or not. They probably won't last that long thanks to the reduced features.
User avatar
SyntheticD
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 12:33 am
Location: City Of Industry, CA
Contact:

Post by SyntheticD »

last year i purchased a Geforce 5950 Ultra GT from Gigabyte im pushing 102 FPS from Farcry at ultra high and 220 FPS from Halo

This could also be assoiated with my processor,

but, if you want to do some serious gaming get better than an entry level card, aslo you could look into upgrading into AMD 64 bit CPUs MSI makes the Best Board for them and memory is decently priced 2 gigs was 170 bucks from newegg.com

over all i would still try to get into the latest technology just because every time a new game comes out it becomes more demanding of you Comp, try playing doom 3 or something like that on My moms HP i though i was blow that stupid machine up :D :D
"That is not dead which can eternal lie / And with strange aeons even death may die."
H.P. Lovecraft
Quoting the Necronomicon, in "The Nameless City"

Giuld Wars Guild [url="http://www.freewebs.com/the_divisors/"]http://www.freewebs.com/the_divisors/[/url]
User avatar
Rookierookie
Posts: 1253
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 2:22 am
Contact:

Post by Rookierookie »

Latest is not necessarily the best; I've heard stories of people "upgrading" from a 5900XT to a 6200.

Right now, I don't think anyone should buy a card higher than the X800GTO if they don't have a 20" or larger screen. Even the latest games like Battlefield 2 can run with details at max at 1280x1024 on a Geforce 6600GT, with AA and AF thrown in for good measure.
Post Reply