Is this multiplayer party good?

thorax · Post by **thorax** » Sun Feb 16, 2003 6:02 pm

thorax assassin/mage: dual at level 9
virst assassin/mage: dual at level 12
crush assassin/fighter: fighter duals at level 9
magicus illusionist/thief: gnome multiclass
madtor thief/illusionist: mage duals at level 15
nemona thief/cleric:multiclass

nothing makes me happier than to backstab an enemy 5 times

Stilgar · Post by **Stilgar** » Mon Feb 17, 2003 6:58 am

Originally posted by thorax
thorax assassin/mage: dual at level 9
virst assassin/mage: dual at level 12
crush assassin/fighter: fighter duals at level 9
magicus illusionist/thief: gnome multiclass
madtor thief/illusionist: mage duals at level 15
nemona thief/cleric:multiclass

nothing makes me happier than to backstab an enemy 5 times

Well, that are alot of thiefes.
Every party is good if you use it right.
But I don't think you should have that much thiefes,
just have 1 (or 2 if you want) thiefes or assassins.
Or take less people in you're party so you level up quicker.
Maybe a:
f/t multi
m/t dual
c/t multi
assassin

party

or any other option you like,
I think the game can be beaten with any party you like.
(but I tend to rely the most on mages, so a all fighter party could be hard for me)

majoola · Post by **majoola** » Tue Feb 18, 2003 7:32 pm

@ thorax: hmm...I'm not sure if a specialist mage can dual class, though...can they? Well, if they can, then good luck with the illusionist/thief. Otherwise, why not go bounty hunter mage or swashbuckler mage--maybe not due to the X0 backstab (so that your party doesn't consist of multiple murderous thieves). Or your party could use a little help from enhanced bardsong...just a thought.

Stilgar · Post by **Stilgar** » Wed Feb 19, 2003 2:40 am

Originally posted by majoola
Or your party could use a little help from enhanced bardsong...just a thought.

No party needs enhanched bardsong

Thanatos · Post by **Thanatos** » Thu Feb 20, 2003 12:33 am

No party needs -bards-

.

How weird would it be if your whole party consisted entirely of thieves and they're all sneaking up on an enemy, when all of a sudden one them spontaneously burst into song?

Stilgar · Post by **Stilgar** » Thu Feb 20, 2003 3:15 am

Originally posted by Thanatos
No party needs -bards- .

That's what I was saying only not that percise.
I totally agree

Originally posted by Thanatos
How weird would it be if your whole party consisted entirely of thieves and they're all sneaking up on an enemy, when all of a sudden one them spontaneously burst into song?

LOL, that remindsme of a very good impression someone (I believe Astafas) once did of a barbarian/thief.

Rob-hin · Post by **Rob-hin** » Thu Feb 20, 2003 6:54 am

I think it's pretty cool to try an all rogue party!
Go for it.

Screaming Johny · Post by **Screaming Johny** » Fri Feb 21, 2003 9:50 am

BTW, I love the idea. I think I'll try a bunch of backstabbers for my next game.

If your main purpose is to backstab, why not try a Stalker? Minsc makes a great Stalker.

You could also create a Stalker/Cleric. This would give you both the cleric and druid spells. While it limits you to staffs and clubs for backtabbing, the staff of ram is one of the best backstabbing weapons anyway!

Oh, and could you imagine the traps!