Studly - Spam is probably unavoidable

CM · Post by CM » Mon Apr 01, 2002 3:12 pm

Viv: met my match in what?
He plays tennis?

WK: Don't count yourself that lucky ok?

CE: What is with the hugging?
I am not a cutie softie etc etc.
Women bah!
*grumble, grumble, darn women, racham frascham, can't keep their hands to themselves.*

Witch King · Post by **Witch King** » Mon Apr 01, 2002 3:27 pm

edited for content by fdl

CM · Post by CM » Mon Apr 01, 2002 3:31 pm

FDL?
Whats that?
Come on foul, lets here what you have to say.

Witch King · Post by **Witch King** » Mon Apr 01, 2002 3:34 pm

Originally posted by CM
FDL? What's that?

Ha! A very, very good question.

I have a habit of writing down little insipid comments and then deleting them, seeing who catches me. I like it when several people do, but not the target of my attack, then we can talk about it behind their backs in front of them. This most recent was directed at you.

I assure you, it was a pointless as it was juvenile.

My style, if you will.

CM · Post by CM » Mon Apr 01, 2002 3:40 pm

Directed to me?
Well that was obvious.
But why don't you wish the one it is aimed at to see it?

FDL? - Foul Dimmer lock or something?

Witch King · Post by **Witch King** » Mon Apr 01, 2002 3:41 pm

Originally posted by CM
Directed to me?
Well that was obvious.
But why don't you wish the one it is aimed at to see it?

Re-read post.

T'lainya · Post by **T'lainya** » Mon Apr 01, 2002 3:48 pm

Originally posted by CM
Directed to me?
Well that was obvious.
But why don't you wish the one it is aimed at to see it?

FDL? - Foul Dimmer lock or something?

FoulDwimmerlaik although there's been a few variations on it

Vivien · Post by **Vivien** » Mon Apr 01, 2002 3:57 pm

WK: The unwritten rules are hard to tear up, but that was sweet

For a man to try to grope a girl he's on a date with it's 'normal', (you know the whole 'arm over shoulder, reaching for her chest during a movie') if a woman were to reach towards a certain area of a man's body on a first date, I think the man would be frightened away. I've never tested this theory, but I've always assumed it would be too forward.

*starts to have serious thoughts about testing this theory to prove that the world's not as steoreotypical as assumed*

Weasel · Post by **Weasel** » Mon Apr 01, 2002 4:02 pm

Originally posted by Vivien
WK: The unwritten rules are hard to tear up, but that was sweet

For a man to try to grope a girl he's on a date with it's 'normal', (you know the whole 'arm over shoulder, reaching for her chest during a movie') if a woman were to reach towards a certain area of a man's body on a first date, I think the man would be frightened away. I've never tested this theory, but I've always assumed it would be too forward.

*starts to have serious thoughts about testing this theory to prove that the world's not as steoreotypical as assumed*

"Waits to hear Waverlys comment"

Witch King · Post by **Witch King** » Mon Apr 01, 2002 4:10 pm

V: I've had a woman do that to me on a first date more than once. Women feel that they have the right to do those sorts of things because 1) they know the man typically won't fight it and 2) they know society wouldn't successfully let the man prosecute because of it

However, I was not offended by this gesture, quite the opposite. But then, I don't really date much, I typically just get involved in a series of short relationships.

Robnark · Post by **Robnark** » Mon Apr 01, 2002 4:12 pm

are you trying it ot on unaware victims, or are you looking for volunteers

Weasel · Post by **Weasel** » Mon Apr 01, 2002 4:23 pm

"Possible Evidence"

Subcase: 56702

Operation Smoking Skunk.

"This document contains possible evidence of Alter-ego tampering. It is the order of the court that the ISP be checked against one Waverly and Flagg"

(Keep for future reference)

Originally posted by Robnark
are you trying it ot on unaware victims, or are you looking for volunteers

Vivien · Post by **Vivien** » Tue Apr 02, 2002 5:18 pm

Foul: The closest I've come....well...I better not get into that.

Rob: Rofl

I Think CM would be telling you to run now while you have the chance

Aegis · Post by **Aegis** » Tue Apr 02, 2002 7:07 pm

Originally posted by Vivien

*starts to have serious thoughts about testing this theory to prove that the world's not as steoreotypical as assumed*

*Starts to think about hunting Viv down*

FoulDwimmerlaik although there's been a few variations on it

Yes, like Weasel, his name has changed mulitple times.

Witch King · Post by **Witch King** » Tue Apr 02, 2002 7:31 pm

Originally posted by Vivien
Foul: The closest I've come....well...I better not get into that.

Yes you should. You should PM me all of the gory details. Or at least start a new thread devoted entirely to the subject.

nael · Post by **nael** » Tue Apr 02, 2002 9:46 pm

Originally posted by Vivien
WK: The unwritten rules are hard to tear up, but that was sweet

For a man to try to grope a girl he's on a date with it's 'normal', (you know the whole 'arm over shoulder, reaching for her chest during a movie') if a woman were to reach towards a certain area of a man's body on a first date, I think the man would be frightened away. I've never tested this theory, but I've always assumed it would be too forward.

*starts to have serious thoughts about testing this theory to prove that the world's not as steoreotypical as assumed*

boy, i don't know what kind of guys you've dated in the past tht would be scared away. i don't think the guy would have much respect for you, but i really doubt he would stop you.

Vivien · Post by **Vivien** » Wed Apr 03, 2002 2:40 pm

Originally posted by nael

boy, i don't know what kind of guys you've dated in the past tht would be scared away. i don't think the guy would have much respect for you, but i really doubt he would stop you.

I hadn't said I HAD done this, or HAD tested this theory. It was merely a theory.

The kinds of guys I've dated in the past?? The nice kinds.

As to the respect issue?? It's completely respectable for a man to try and grope females on the first date, yet it's NOT the other way around is what you're saying?

Aegis: *hug* You're Canadian, I'm Minnesotan. We have a natural protection in case of just such a threat.

You'd get lost in our boundary waters like so many before you. After many years pass, they'll find you on your island still trying to get the tree to curve properly to make a birch bark canoe.

Foul: Listen stud. I remember waaay back when you challenged me to mud wrestling. I think you lost, if I remember correctly.

Therefore, pming you intimate details of my sex life would be rubbing salt on an open wound and demeaning to your manly facade.

I wouldn't want to hurt you in that way.

*hug*

Witch King · Post by **Witch King** » Wed Apr 03, 2002 2:45 pm

ATTENTION: VIVIEN IS A LIAR

OMG, you won our mud-wrestling contest?!??!?!?!!?

You are severly misled, I crushed you like a gnat under my fingers of doom.

Come on people, support me here. Who remembers that match?

Minerva · Post by **Minerva** » Wed Apr 03, 2002 3:01 pm

Re: ATTENTION: VIVIEN IS A LIAR

Originally posted by Witch King
OMG, you won our mud-wrestling contest?!??!?!?!!?

You are severly misled, I crushed you like a gnat under my fingers of doom.

Come on people, support me here. Who remembers that match?

I can only remember you and Waverly's mud restling match. Both me and T'laniya were not so keen to join in...

Witch King · Post by **Witch King** » Wed Apr 03, 2002 3:05 pm

HEY VIVIEN! HERE'S PROOF

Originally posted by Minerva

I can remember that you pounded that girl, that much was clear. I laughed so hard when she, naked and panting for breath, begged for mercy, and you just laughed (you were so manly), and then pushed her into the mud and left the ring victorious. I also remember you and Waverly's mud restling match, but although you won, it wasn't quite as exciting to me personally, nor to T'laniya (we really wanted to join in..).