Originally posted by Aragorn Returns
well here's the thing, i'm very very alergic to cats, i can't even go to people's houses if they have a cat. i would not be ok sitting anywhere near a cat for several hours.
some people wouldn't be comfortable with a dog on a plane becuase they're afraid of what the dog might do. example: you are one of those annoying paranoid over protective mothers of an 8 month old baby. and there is a pitbull sitting next to you. how are you going to feel?
also, some people are afraid of animals, i know a few actually.
one more thing, some people actually do have violent animals, they might be dangerous (the dog trial here in l.a. for example). now, you can say that people ought to use discretion and not bring a violent animal onboard, but you know that's not going to happen, people will bring wild animals anyway.
in short, i don't think that animals should be allowed to have seats on airplanes.
well, for starters, cats could be on just about every plane you'll be on; they have littlew carriers that often look like a regular carry on bag. so, your cat allergy is already being ignored.
as far as violent animals, once again let me say that i think the animal should be placed in a harness. i don't think muzzling is a neccessary step, if so, then kids should be as well. at least that would shut them up.
@SS - no, if someone is allergic to peanuts, just getting the oil on them will cause VERY bad things. there are schools in the country that have banned peanut butter. which enrages a lot of families since peanut butter is a nice cheap source of protein for their kids.
I would be a serial killer if i didn't have such a strong distaste for manual labor