Theological Quandaries 101
Thanks for the word, i kind of had colocquilism in mind, but i checked it out and that means something different, oh well.
How can you say that evolution is observable, when was the last time you saw something actually evolving? I know that sounds slightly banal, but still one can not absolutely proove it, it requires huge bounds in logic, just the same as any religion.
See your question was a lot more specific than Wav's i didn't have a way of not answering without sounding half a$$ed.
How can you say that evolution is observable, when was the last time you saw something actually evolving? I know that sounds slightly banal, but still one can not absolutely proove it, it requires huge bounds in logic, just the same as any religion.
See your question was a lot more specific than Wav's i didn't have a way of not answering without sounding half a$$ed.
I'd have to get drunk every night and talk about virility...And those Pink elephants I'd see.
- Georgi
- Posts: 11288
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2001 10:00 pm
- Location: Can't wait to get on the road again...
- Contact:
I know, that was the idea
I'm not saying you can watch *an* organism evolve but there are organisms which have a much shorter lifespan than humans, and it is possible to examine several generations of offspring and observe differences between them...
Another possibility is vernacularism... as in a word that has passed into the vernacular (or native language).
I'm not saying you can watch *an* organism evolve but there are organisms which have a much shorter lifespan than humans, and it is possible to examine several generations of offspring and observe differences between them...
Another possibility is vernacularism... as in a word that has passed into the vernacular (or native language).
Who, me?!?
Sleep, evolution is indeed observable. Let’s look a microevolition: The classic example is selective breeding. Over several generations, do you deny that by preferentially breeding dogs with certain traits, man has created breeds of dogs that look wholly different from the wolves that they once were? Now what if we were to give the process more time than just a few generations? And just for the hell of it, take out man’s influence on which traits to exaggerate by breeding, and replace it with preferential breeding by success at merely surviving…
Then darkness took me, and I strayed out of thought and time
That one seems more likely (i have actually heard of that word
)
True but as much of that could be changed by environment ie male fish turning into females due to high deposits of oestrogen in the water. I just think the time frame for evolution is a little off, every few years it seems to go up by a few billion
anyone know what darwin orginally surmised?
Also Darwin is not the most stable of influences he was very bitter at the church which he felt had betrayed him. So whatever views he came to were tainted by hate.
True but as much of that could be changed by environment ie male fish turning into females due to high deposits of oestrogen in the water. I just think the time frame for evolution is a little off, every few years it seems to go up by a few billion
Also Darwin is not the most stable of influences he was very bitter at the church which he felt had betrayed him. So whatever views he came to were tainted by hate.
I'd have to get drunk every night and talk about virility...And those Pink elephants I'd see.
Well, and the church was not fond of Darwin, so the churcs respons to darwinism might have been clouded by that toOriginally posted by Mr Sleep:
<STRONG><snip>Also Darwin is not the most stable of influences he was very bitter at the church which he felt had betrayed him. So whatever views he came to were tainted by hate.</STRONG>
Insert signature here.
I did not say that either were right or wrong....
Some interesting facts for you..
Darwin is said to have denounced all of his ideas on his death bed, but this is conjecture due to this being reported by his wife who - not wantng to look out of place in the society of the time - allegedly came up with the story.
In answer to Wav, you say take out mans influence, but isn't it man who put the two together in the first place.
BTW i realise i am out of my depth, but i will continue eith my futile arguments

Some interesting facts for you..
Darwin is said to have denounced all of his ideas on his death bed, but this is conjecture due to this being reported by his wife who - not wantng to look out of place in the society of the time - allegedly came up with the story.
In answer to Wav, you say take out mans influence, but isn't it man who put the two together in the first place.
BTW i realise i am out of my depth, but i will continue eith my futile arguments
I'd have to get drunk every night and talk about virility...And those Pink elephants I'd see.
- Georgi
- Posts: 11288
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2001 10:00 pm
- Location: Can't wait to get on the road again...
- Contact:
I think when you put it in a science lab, the environmental effects are rather more carefully monitored...
I'm not saying that everything Darwin said was right, theories of evolution have changed as more observations were made. All I'm saying is that the change happens.
Darwin's motivations in looking for an alternative explanation don't necessarily make his own explanation false. If people were always happy with the explanation they had, and never questioned it, there would never be any progress.
@Kramor - does a belief in evolution necessarily rule out a belief that something had to create it in the first place? Can't evolution have taken place since creation?
[ 06-05-2001: Message edited by: Georgi ]
I'm not saying that everything Darwin said was right, theories of evolution have changed as more observations were made. All I'm saying is that the change happens.
Darwin's motivations in looking for an alternative explanation don't necessarily make his own explanation false. If people were always happy with the explanation they had, and never questioned it, there would never be any progress.
@Kramor - does a belief in evolution necessarily rule out a belief that something had to create it in the first place? Can't evolution have taken place since creation?
[ 06-05-2001: Message edited by: Georgi ]
Who, me?!?
I have to agree with you about progress.Originally posted by Georgi:
<STRONG>I'm not saying that everything Darwin said was right, theories of evolution have changed as more observations were made. All I'm saying is that the change happens.
Darwin's motivations in looking for an alternative explanation don't necessarily make his own explanation false. If people were always happy with the explanation they had, and never questioned it, there would never be any progress.</STRONG>
Change does indeed happen, just how and why are the questions that need answering after that point.
Just out of interest how many of the pro evolution are scientists or of a mathematical nature?
I'd have to get drunk every night and talk about virility...And those Pink elephants I'd see.
- Georgi
- Posts: 11288
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2001 10:00 pm
- Location: Can't wait to get on the road again...
- Contact:
Well surely if evolution is defined as change, and you are saying change does happen, then you are saying evolution is a fact? Not necessarily one specific theory of evolution, just in itself.
Let me see, the last maths/science I did was GCSE... which would be 4 years ago
No, I'm no expert on evolutionary theory...
Let me see, the last maths/science I did was GCSE... which would be 4 years ago
Who, me?!?
Well with 95%+ of the same genematerial with some species I would say that this is acutally a very plausible theory just looking at numbers.Originally posted by KramoR:
<STRONG><snip>What I don't understand is how we are supposed to come from apes. I just don't see it could be possable.
*I can't spell worth a damn today.*</STRONG>
Of course a lot of people will recent such a theory because apes are ... well... apes
Insert signature here.
You are trying to arrive at a conclusion, when i do not necessarily wish to, i prefer to keep asking questions than to arrive at a definitive answer.
I love the idea that you die as soon as you figure out exactly what the world is really about.
I love the idea that you die as soon as you figure out exactly what the world is really about.
I'd have to get drunk every night and talk about virility...And those Pink elephants I'd see.
It seems to me that people who are scientific/mathematical by nature end up beleiving in the Evolution theory where as more artistic people struggle with the evolution idea and end up beleiving some form of spirituality, of course there are people who believe in neither, and there are those who believe in both. 
I'd have to get drunk every night and talk about virility...And those Pink elephants I'd see.
Well being more scientific interested and mathematicl myself - I don't neascecary support evolution, but I find it to be more plausible compared to say creationism.
I have serious issues with creationism where I can't get thing to match
The closest thing to a God I at present could commint myself to say existed would be the singularity know as the Big Bang
That could be (a) God.
But as for a "Creator God" as in creatism, that made the planets, Adam and Eve etc. that I can't simply understand, and especially not if the world is created 6000 years ago.
I have serious issues with creationism where I can't get thing to match
The closest thing to a God I at present could commint myself to say existed would be the singularity know as the Big Bang
That could be (a) God.
But as for a "Creator God" as in creatism, that made the planets, Adam and Eve etc. that I can't simply understand, and especially not if the world is created 6000 years ago.
Insert signature here.
- Georgi
- Posts: 11288
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2001 10:00 pm
- Location: Can't wait to get on the road again...
- Contact:
I don't think it's true that artistic people necessarily think less logically
Some people seem to have more of a need for something to believe in than others. And maybe at some point I will decide there's some big spiritual emptiness inside me and I want something to fill it. And then I might think about it some more.
Incidentally a friend of mine did exactly that. She researched several religions, and became a Christian. She was for a few years, but it lapsed. She said she didn't think she had really believed it in the first place, she just wanted to believe.
BTW I apologise if I'm repeating stuff that has already been said in this thread, I've only read the first page and a half

Some people seem to have more of a need for something to believe in than others. And maybe at some point I will decide there's some big spiritual emptiness inside me and I want something to fill it. And then I might think about it some more.
Incidentally a friend of mine did exactly that. She researched several religions, and became a Christian. She was for a few years, but it lapsed. She said she didn't think she had really believed it in the first place, she just wanted to believe.
BTW I apologise if I'm repeating stuff that has already been said in this thread, I've only read the first page and a half
Who, me?!?