What would your [b]PERFECT!![/b] job be and how would you do it.

edguy · Post by **edguy** » Wed May 30, 2001 12:30 pm

Oh, great. I wasn't really expecting that many stars. One or MAYBE two'd be more like it.

BTW.. is it GOOD to have many stars? I suppose it is, but in the FAQ it doesn't really say.. it could be the other way around. If so.. thanx a lot! hehe.

Georgi · Post by **Georgi** » Wed May 30, 2001 12:35 pm

Evenin' all

I wouldn't worry about spamming craig's topic if I were you, Edguy, since he has spammed just about everyone else's...

So am I the only person who doesn't bother with the whole stupid user ratings thing? It seems kinda pointless to me...

Waverly · Post by **Waverly** » Wed May 30, 2001 12:37 pm

Originally posted by Georgi:
am I the only person who doesn't bother with the whole stupid user ratings thing? It seems kinda pointless to me...

Hmm. I wonder if Buck would let me change my rating for you... you might be less glib with, say, a 1

Georgi · Post by **Georgi** » Wed May 30, 2001 12:43 pm

Actually, I rarely take notice of my rating, Waverly, you can change it to whatever you want

It's not like I'm going to get all upset and cry if I haven't got 5 stars, and leave the board and never spam here again... (You'll have to think of something else

)

Waverly · Post by **Waverly** » Wed May 30, 2001 12:52 pm

@Georgi: I just have rating envy ever since Foul pulled his ratings sabbatage

I still think people's status shouldn't be limited to Member and Exalted member. I'd like to see 'sea cucumber', 'pathetic wanker', or 'desperate loner' when appropriate.

[ 05-30-2001: Message edited by: Waverly ]

Georgi · Post by **Georgi** » Wed May 30, 2001 12:57 pm

Oh great, and give people even more reason to get annoyed about low ratings

Hey maybe people should be allowed to leave anonymous insults with their ratings too!

I haven't bothered rating anyone myself... but if it'll make you feel better, I'll go and rate you

BTW I don't think you'll get banned from the forum, you're far too aware of what you're saying...

Waverly · Post by **Waverly** » Wed May 30, 2001 1:04 pm

I like the anonymous insult idea. There's an email sevice that will do that for you too

I hope Buck considers Waverly(tm) Brand Filth more subtle than overt...

Georgi · Post by **Georgi** » Wed May 30, 2001 1:25 pm

Well, okay, it's not always that subtle... but it's rarely offensive

vixen · Post by **vixen** » Wed May 30, 2001 1:50 pm

If 'exalted member' was replaced with other comments, what would yours be, Mr 5165 posts?

Georgi · Post by **Georgi** » Wed May 30, 2001 1:54 pm

I can think of some, but they aren't really *ahem* postable

Minerva · Post by **Minerva** » Wed May 30, 2001 1:56 pm

Originally posted by vixen:
If 'exalted member' was replaced with other comments, what would yours be, Mr 5165 posts?

He was regarded as the Moron by the definition, as far as I can remember...

vixen · Post by **vixen** » Wed May 30, 2001 1:59 pm

Originally posted by Minerva:
He was regarded as the Moron by the definition, as far as I can remember...

Where was that definition? I remember seeing it.

But surely king nerd would be more appropriate than moron? Moron implies some sort of character defamation. Which of course we wouldn't wish on Waverly.....

Minerva · Post by **Minerva** » Wed May 30, 2001 2:06 pm

Originally posted by vixen:
Where was that definition? I remember seeing it.

The original was posted by Ubik, but I think Brink put it in his list.

But surely king nerd would be more appropriate than moron? Moron implies some sort of character defamation. Which of course we wouldn't wish on Waverly.....

ROFL

Waverly · Post by **Waverly** » Wed May 30, 2001 2:09 pm

@Ladies: Very funny

This is when the 'Giggling Strumpet' member status would come in handy

As for Waverly, I don't know... I don't think I like the options

5000 posts is not healthy, methinks..

Brink · Post by **Brink** » Wed May 30, 2001 2:10 pm

Whatever rank that you give Waverly,I would be affected as well

vixen · Post by **vixen** » Wed May 30, 2001 2:14 pm

Originally posted by Brink:
Whatever rank that you give Waverly,I would be affected as well

And Weasel also. So we'd better make it nice. How about 'expressive GB member'?

vixen · Post by **vixen** » Wed May 30, 2001 2:15 pm

Double post. How special. Like a double yolk egg.

[ 05-30-2001: Message edited by: vixen ]

Brink · Post by **Brink** » Wed May 30, 2001 2:19 pm

vixen-

Minerva · Post by **Minerva** » Wed May 30, 2001 2:20 pm

@vixen: I think anyone with 3000+ posts should be called simply 'mad'....

vixen · Post by **vixen** » Wed May 30, 2001 2:34 pm

Originally posted by Minerva:
@vixen: I think anyone with 3000+ posts should be called simply 'mad'....

Don't be harsh on yourself. I will be there shortly if I don't get on with some work soon...!