Posted by C E -
LOL![]()
![]()
And before trying the method on DP, she tried it on herself
ROFLMAO!
Cool!Originally posted by C Elegans:
<STRONG>@Ysh: LOL![]()
Here's the laureates in Physics, 3 guys who have achived the Bose-Einstein condensation in gases![]()
[url="http://www.nobel.se/physics/laureates/2001/press.html"]http://www.nobel.se/physics/laureates/2001/press.html[/url]</STRONG>
Now you only need some votes...this year, I think some 140 people were nominated, some Norweigan MP nominated Fidel CastroOriginally posted by Kayless:
<STRONG>See? With Aegis putting in a good word for me (and maybe slipping some 20s) I?m a shoe in! (Finally, it's all coming up Kayless! MUWHAHAHAHA!!)</STRONG>
Yes, SEK = Swedish KronaOriginally posted by McBane:
<STRONG>The prize amount was listed "SEK 10 million".
Is that swedish currency?</STRONG>
Maybe Knowles can't feed himselfOriginally posted by McBane:
<STRONG>One of the winners is 84 years old.
I hope I have the mental capacity to feed myself at 84!</STRONG>
Hey CE, $950 000 is actually a lot of money... even if it's divided...Originally posted by C Elegans:
<STRONG>Yes, SEK = Swedish Krona
10 million SEK equals about 950 000 $US.
It's of course a small sum of money in the context, but getting the Nobel prize means a lot not only as acknowledgement, it also means you won't have any more trouble funding your research in the future</STRONG>
Sure it's a lot of money! I meant small in the context of what research of the type that most people get Nobel prizes for costs...Originally posted by Aegis:
<STRONG>Hey CE, $950 000 is actually a lot of money... even if it's divided...</STRONG>
And this is why I must become rich. I plan on doing as much of my research as I can on my own without relying on government grants and such.Originally posted by C Elegans:
<STRONG>Sure it's a lot of money! I meant small in the context of what research of the type that most people get Nobel prizes for costs...
I work in a comparatively small lab, we are about 35 people specialised in different areas. Our old lab cost about $8 millions, and the new equipment we installed during this year, cost about $2.5 million.
Do you remember last years Physics prize winners, the semiconduction guys? Now, a lab where you can perform the kind of research they had done, would need equipment for like $500 millions.
And they you all the running expenses. Research is very expensive</STRONG>
I recently read somewhere that the cost of a linear collsion high energy particle accelerator would be about $6 billion.Originally posted by Sailor Saturn:
<STRONG>And this is why I must become rich. I plan on doing as much of my research as I can on my own without relying on government grants and such.</STRONG>
</STRONG>posted by Aegis:
<STRONG>I want to be rich too, just not have to work for it... in other words, my dad better get working hard!
I dunno... bill Gates... Microsoft... hmm... I think It'd be better if I earned it...Originally posted by C Elegans:
<STRONG>I recently read somewhere that the cost of a linear collsion high energy particle accelerator would be about $6 billion.
I don't know how much the new CERN LHC will be, but it's said to be in a similar region.
Detection of the Higgs boson and other, unknown particles that are believed to occur when matter and antimatter collide, is an expensive business. But it's most probably the only way to go if we want to understand what happened during the Big Bang (or rather, the nanoseconds after) and if we want to unify the 4 forces.
What a pity we can't collide electrons and positrons at home in the kitchen![]()
</STRONG>posted by Aegis:
[qb]I want to be rich too, just not have to work for it... in other words, my dad better get working hard!
I see only one solution to your and SS common problem - marry Bill Gates![]()
[ 10-10-2001: Message edited by: C Elegans ][/QB]