They should be knighted--or whatever (no spam)
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2002 4:44 pm
One of the problems with a republic is that while businessmen, sports heroes and politicians get fat salaries and awards everywhere, your government can't give the comparatively lofty but unremunerative award to the kind of people who really do make a cultural difference. I mean, of course, knighthoods (or damehoods) and such. Got a fabulously important scientist, a world-renowned violinist, an outstanding economist? If you live in the UK, they can at least get an honorary recognition from the government that makes them feel good, and gives the rest of the nation the impression that hey, the arts and the sciences do matter a bit, after all. Even the French, who pride themselves on their republican ideals, maintain lofty national organizations into which celebrated individuals are inducted as a matter of national civic pride. The French also name streets after great poets. We in the US name ours after types of trees. Personally, I like trees; trees are some of my best friends. But I don't think they'd be offended if we named a square after fine American composers, writers, pioneer computer scientists, historians, etc.
So whom do you think should receive such a prestigious reward, that has absolutely no chance of getting one in this particular lifetime of theirs?
So whom do you think should receive such a prestigious reward, that has absolutely no chance of getting one in this particular lifetime of theirs?