Page 1 of 2
Disclaimer
Posted: Fri May 18, 2001 3:48 pm
by Anatres
Screen name: Anatres
Any and all postings under this screen name are intended as the ruminations of said screen name only. Said screen name has no intent with said postings to insult, flame, sway, cajole or otherwise change anyone over to any beliefs stated in said postings.
Said screen name intends only to impart his knowledge through debate, question and answers to further provoke thought in any willing member of said debate or discussion.
Said screen name offers a general apology to any member of this bulletin board he may have offended in any way.
Said screen name reserves the right to state his opinions in a civil and (hopefully) informative manner. And to spam where he finds that appropiate.....
.....END
Posted: Fri May 18, 2001 3:54 pm
by Brink
Posted: Fri May 18, 2001 3:56 pm
by Anatres
@Brink; not really worried, but some of the responses I get seem a bit testy.
Posted: Fri May 18, 2001 4:01 pm
by Brink
That kind of response is bound to happen in a discussion about religion
Btw,I'm not taking part in the theological discussion anymore since you guys have better knowledge than I do in that field

.(That doesn't mean that I won't read it though

)
[ 05-18-2001: Message edited by: Brink ]
Posted: Fri May 18, 2001 4:05 pm
by Anatres
Well, at least in my case, alot of it is just
speculation. But I'm getting a bit bored with it as it seems to be getting redundant and a bit pedantic.
Maybe we should start a thread about anthropology. That ought to get some
lively debate going

!
EDIT: spelling - again

!
[ 05-18-2001: Message edited by: Anatres ]
Posted: Fri May 18, 2001 4:13 pm
by Brink
Anthropology??
You should try finding a subject that isn't such a sensitive matter (ie. religion

) yet something that everyone can relate to
[ 05-18-2001: Message edited by: Brink ]
Posted: Fri May 18, 2001 4:13 pm
by Weasel
@Anatres ....I believe the problem is....some don't know what civil is.
Posted: Fri May 18, 2001 4:19 pm
by Anatres
@Weasel; that and some folks just take the free exchange of ideas too
personally.
@Brink; I was being facetious

Posted: Fri May 18, 2001 4:22 pm
by Brink
Anatres-I know

(did you not see the

at the end?

)
Posted: Fri May 18, 2001 4:29 pm
by Anatres
Posted: Fri May 18, 2001 4:35 pm
by Brink
Posted: Fri May 18, 2001 4:37 pm
by Darkpoet
How about a discussion on how many chips are in a chocolate chip cookie?

Posted: Fri May 18, 2001 4:42 pm
by Anatres
@DP; nah, not controversial enough! Unless you want to debate the merits of Oatmeal/raisin verses Chocolate chip!!!

Posted: Fri May 18, 2001 4:43 pm
by Darkpoet
Posted: Fri May 18, 2001 4:45 pm
by Brink
Posted: Fri May 18, 2001 4:52 pm
by Weasel
Originally posted by Anatres:
<STRONG>@Brink; are you telling me what to see?

</STRONG>
Are you telling Brink that you are asking if Brink is telling you what you see?

Posted: Fri May 18, 2001 4:57 pm
by Anatres
@Weasel;
listen, if i can't see exactly what I
want to see then noone is ging to tell me that they can see anything different!!

Posted: Fri May 18, 2001 5:00 pm
by Weasel
Anatres: Great post in
Poll: Pollitical Beliefs vs Allignment
As for the seeing part....I'm at a loss

Posted: Fri May 18, 2001 5:02 pm
by Anatres
@Weasel; not quite back on firm
spam footing are we?
EDIT: Oh, and thanks.....
[ 05-18-2001: Message edited by: Anatres ]
Posted: Fri May 18, 2001 5:04 pm
by Weasel
@Anatres ....I know my limits..
