Page 4 of 4

Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:52 pm
by Beowulf
Originally posted by fable
Any quiz show that plays mind games on contestants. When my wife and I hit the fitness center a few months back I saw something called "The Weakest Link," in which the contestants actually chose to throw out those among themselves who performed the worst. The MC meanwhile put on an ice-persona and asked demeaning questions meant to make the idiots look even poorer. IMO, that stinks: if I want a dose of believing the worst about the human race, I'll go watch some Bush Administration spokesperson. :rolleyes:


IMHO, it's not the fake ice-persona which is truly awful. I find it far worse the way contestants invariably explain their nominations for person to chuck by saying "Well, I had a had a terrible round, but I think <name if miscreant> did almost as bad as me" Ugh.
But even more traumatising than that, is the disgustingly staged wink that she gives at the end of the show. *shudders*

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2002 9:53 am
by Osiris
Originally posted by Beowulf
.......But even more traumatising than that, is the disgustingly staged wink that she gives at the end of the show. *shudders*


....thus giving the impression that she is smarter than all those on the show. The Australian version is hosted by an ex-soapie "star", which makes it all the more revolting. :cool:

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2002 2:44 pm
by Tybaltus
Originally posted by Osiris
....thus giving the impression that she is smarter than all those on the show. The Australian version is hosted by an ex-soapie "star", which makes it all the more revolting. :cool:
Here in America, we get a second version with a comedian. He is actually quite funny at times, so no real complaints from me. The show isnt the best, so I tend not to watch it, but if Im really bored, and its on, then Id watch it. Youre right. I dont like the woman host from England, either.

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2002 2:53 pm
by Robnark
Originally posted by Tybaltus
I dont like the woman host from England, either.
no argument here. that horrendous wink she does at the end of each episode is buttock-clenchingly awful, and what's worse, the weakest link is right before the simpsons and you always catch the end of it *shudders* :rolleyes:

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2002 2:58 pm
by Tybaltus
Originally posted by Robnark
no argument here. that horrendous wink she does at the end of each episode is buttock-clenchingly awful, and what's worse, the weakest link is right before the simpsons and you always catch the end of it *shudders* :rolleyes:
LOL :D .....I feel sorry for you, man. At least you forget about the wink if its a good episode of the Simpsons. But I guess EVERYONE hates her wink, myself included. :D

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2002 3:03 pm
by Mr Flibble
Shortland Street. For those who haven't seen it (mostly anyone outside NZ) this show is a true nightmare. I'm not even going to insult acting by saying that this one is a bad attempt at it. They've taken every sad, cheesy pathetic soap opera story and made it even more sad, cheesy and pathetic. And what's worse is it gets funding from NZ On Air (basically government funding) because it's a home-grown series. IMO the only purpose to this program is to reduce the average intelligence of the general public for some dark government secret.

Reality shows. Big Brother, Temptation Island, all the 'become a pop star' rubbish. It's like producers have run out of good ideas. :rolleyes:

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2002 3:08 pm
by Robnark
Originally posted by Mr Flibble
Shortland Street. For those who haven't seen it (mostly anyone outside NZ) this show is a true nightmare. I'm not even going to insult acting by saying that this one is a bad attempt at it. They've taken every sad, cheesy pathetic soap opera story and made it even more sad, cheesy and pathetic. And what's worse is it gets funding from NZ On Air (basically government funding) because it's a home-grown series. IMO the only purpose to this program is to reduce the average intelligence of the general public for some dark government secret.
yeah, i've seen bits, although i have to say i dimly remember seeing a Shortland Street photo-story type thingy in a magazine, and that came pretty damn close in terms of sheer horrendousnessity but it was a little more bearable because the acting was more lifelike. :rolleyes: :D

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2002 3:15 pm
by Mr Flibble
They're bringing back some of the original characters. The "acting" is going to get even worse :(

What's really sad is how popular it seems to be. I wonder if it's becuase it's made here, or the common people of New Zealand are under some form of mind control? (which begs the question, is Weasel involved :D )

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2002 3:19 pm
by Robnark
Weasel? involved with shortland street? Well, that would be diabolical and all, but surely even Weasel draws the line somewhere? :D

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2002 3:23 pm
by Tybaltus
Originally posted by Mr Flibble
What's really sad is how popular it seems to be. I wonder if it's becuase it's made here, or the common people of New Zealand are under some form of mind control? (which begs the question, is Weasel involved :D )
If people are just TOLD to like it, youd be surprised at how many people just flock to the tv set. You said there are action parts to the show? Well that probably creates a fan base all of its own. Acting is no longer the most important aspect in popular tv. Its what making tv get worse through time. Technology, cheap jokes, sex, and critics are what make people flock to the tv sets now. Im sure I could watch 10 different channels with popular tv shows, and 50-75% of the shows would have lowsy acting. Its the way things are working now, I think.

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2002 3:33 pm
by Mr Flibble
Here's a quick rundown on the story to Shrtland Street:

Private hospital,, poser doctors, brainless receptionists and nurses, everyone jumping into each others beds, no change in it's 8 year history. 'Nuff said.

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2002 3:47 pm
by Scayde
Originally posted by Mr Flibble
Here's a quick rundown on the story to Shrtland Street:

Private hospital,, poser doctors, brainless receptionists and nurses, everyone jumping into each others beds, no change in it's 8 year history. 'Nuff said.
LOL..Sounds a lot like where I work.. :D

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2002 3:53 pm
by Mr Flibble
Originally posted by Scayde
LOL..Sounds a lot like where I work.. :D


Ah, but you have personality (a very interesting one too) ;) . That lot don't.

And I really mean brainless; many of the characters (and probably the actors too) couldn't outwit a used teabag. :rolleyes: :D

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2002 4:04 pm
by Mr Sleep
Originally posted by Mr Flibble
Here's a quick rundown on the story to Shrtland Street:

Private hospital,, poser doctors, brainless receptionists and nurses, everyone jumping into each others beds, no change in it's 8 year history. 'Nuff said.


Ahhh the mighty Shortland Street, what a truly crap show that is, the writers literally make it up as they go along, I get the feeling they use "medicine" to help their writing. Flibble's discription is right on point.

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2002 4:08 pm
by Mr Flibble
Originally posted by Mr Sleep
Ahhh the mighty Shortland Street, what a truly crap show that is, the writers literally make it up as they go along, I get the feeling they use "medicine" to help their writing. Flibble's discription is right on point.


I would like to take this time to isue a formal apology to the poeples of the British Isles for having to suffer through such an horrendous piece of television programming. It is something I would not wish upon the worst of enemies.

I only hope the therapy goes quickly and smoothly. :D