Page 29 of 47
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2001 3:51 am
by Mr Sleep
So your doing the next best thing, spamming up GB

Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2001 3:53 am
by Xandax
Originally posted by Mr Sleep:
<STRONG>So your doing the next best thing, spamming up GB

</STRONG>
Well it is actually better than working
Okay - but I don't want to stay at work anymore - so I'm going home
See you guys later
[ 07-06-2001: Message edited by: Xandax ]
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2001 3:53 am
by Brink
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2001 4:11 am
by Mr Sleep
See you Xan....
Damn another one of my Explorer windows has crashed

Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2001 4:14 am
by Brink
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2001 4:16 am
by Mr Sleep
Originally posted by Brink:
<STRONG>

</STRONG>
That is a confusing meddly of smilies, which one are you most proud of?

Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2001 4:22 am
by Brink
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2001 4:25 am
by Mr Sleep
I thought the

was more impressive

Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2001 4:33 am
by Brink
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2001 4:36 am
by Mr Sleep
Your Probably right?!?!?!

Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2001 4:37 am
by Brink
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2001 4:50 am
by Mr Sleep
It certainly is a possibility

Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2001 5:33 am
by Brink
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2001 5:40 am
by Mr Sleep
Under what pretense does one conclude that they are correct?
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2001 5:50 am
by Brink
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2001 5:53 am
by Mr Sleep
That is not really an adequate excuse

Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2001 5:56 am
by Brink
Oh well...I guess one can conclude that they are correct with the appropriate proof at hand

Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2001 6:01 am
by Mr Sleep
Proof.....Proof.....you talk of proof ,where i see nothing but innuendo and implication

Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2001 6:06 am
by Brink
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2001 6:11 am
by Mr Sleep
One does not see innuendo one imaginines its presence