Page 260 of 1703

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:31 am
by dj_venom
'Kipi is offline'.

And I have an aversion to digging, I usually make others do it. :rolleyes:

I'm still sick with my cold, not sure if it's better or worse. :(

What about you?

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:35 am
by Kipi
dj_venom wrote:'Kipi is offline'.
There is your answer, then...
And I have an aversion to digging, I usually make others do it. :rolleyes:
Lol, not bad idea :D
What about you?
Nothing special, woke up about hour or so ago, nothing to do right now, actually :rolleyes:
or nothing else than to come here to spam :D :D :D

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:39 am
by dj_venom
So what's the reason of hiding your status? :confused:

Nothing wrong with that... I can spam once a week in the morning, all other days I have something on (school or cricket) :rolleyes: .

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:42 am
by Kipi
Here is quote of my reply to Rav when he asked same thing :p ;)
[QUOTE=Kipi]Makes lurking a lots easier :p :p

Seriously, not sure. Maybe because I have GB as my homepage, and there has been occasions when I have got to internet, the browser has logged me inside for a moment before I have managed to change to new site, and someoen has tought that I'm actually online... :rolleyes:
[/QUOTE]

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:44 am
by dj_venom
See! Why dig, when others can :p .

Well that's fair enough, a few times I've left the website on, and had some problems like that. Though I like people to know I'm on (it makes me feel wanted :rolleyes: :D ).

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:56 am
by Kipi
[QUOTE=dj_venom]See! Why dig, when others can :p .

Well that's fair enough, a few times I've left the website on, and had some problems like that. Though I like people to know I'm on (it makes me feel wanted :rolleyes: :D ).[/QUOTE]
Yes, but you can't do Lestat then (Lestat = Lurk&Strike) :D :D :D

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 5:00 am
by dj_venom
After reading the conversation between Hill and Lestat (partly inspired by me), I've come to the realisation I don't want to be Lestat. So I think I'll pass ;) .

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 5:10 am
by Kipi
[QUOTE=dj_venom]After reading the conversation between Hill and Lestat (partly inspired by me), I've come to the realisation I don't want to be Lestat. So I think I'll pass ;) .[/QUOTE]
Never said I would either want to be Lestat, I said if I'm invicible I can do Lestat. There is a huge difference there :p ;) :laugh:

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 5:14 am
by dj_venom
Uhhh, Kipi, why do you want to do Lestat :eek: :p .

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 5:16 am
by Kipi
[QUOTE=dj_venom]Uhhh, Kipi, why do you want to do Lestat :eek: :p .[/QUOTE]
BAH!!
DO I have to explain from basics??

Do Lestat = Lurk and Strike when no-one expects post from that person
;) :p

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 5:20 am
by dj_venom
You misunderstood my use of 'do'.

Oh, certainly, the Lurk and Strike method is effective, but for it to work, you need two people spamming. So in situations like this, it doesn't work. :rolleyes:

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 5:24 am
by Kipi
[QUOTE=dj_venom]You misunderstood my use of 'do'.

Oh, certainly, the Lurk and Strike method is effective, but for it to work, you need two people spamming. So in situations like this, it doesn't work. :rolleyes: [/QUOTE]
Yes, that's true, but it's not possible at all if you aren't invicible :p ;)

And yes, I think I misunderstood your use of "do" :o :o :o

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 5:28 am
by dj_venom
Well I would never go for such underhand tactics. Instead, I would make a diversion, then carry out my dirtywork, it's more challenging that way. :p

And yeah, oh well :) .

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 5:29 am
by Kipi
[QUOTE=dj_venom]Well I would never go for such underhand tactics. Instead, I would make a diversion, then carry out my dirtywork, it's more challenging that way. :p
[/QUOTE]
The Art of Spamming... :laugh::laugh::laugh:

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 5:30 am
by Luis Antonio
[QUOTE=Kipi]The Art of Spamming... :laugh::laugh::laugh:[/QUOTE]

Have you summoned me?

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 5:30 am
by dj_venom
Hehehe :D .

Geez, that cartoon thread is ballistic. I think what LA said is exactly right though, I'm just afraid of posting ;) , otherwise I would have said it earlier.

Hey LA, like your post mate, only too true.

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 5:32 am
by Kipi
[QUOTE=Luis Antonio]Have you summoned me?[/QUOTE]
Oh my!!! :eek:
The archspammer!!! :speech: :speech: :laugh: :laugh:

[QUOTE=dj venom]
Geez, that cartoon thread is ballistic. I think what LA said is exactly right though, I'm just afraid of posting , otherwise I would have said it earlier.
[/QUOTE]
So true...
I don't even dare to make my first post there...

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 5:39 am
by Luis Antonio
That thread is explosive. Damn, people can be unsensitive when it is about religion. Such a thing would be simple enoug if soemone there started flaming everyone, but that seems impossible.

Damn it, though. I'm off.

Hey boys, you summoned me for what? :D

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 5:40 am
by Kipi
[QUOTE=Luis Antonio]
Hey boys, you summoned me for what? :D [/QUOTE]
Dunno...
There were no warnings that saying "The Art of Spamming" would summon you... :p :laugh:
There really should be such warning... ;)

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 5:41 am
by dj_venom
Sorry mate, I'm going.

Night all. :)