Page 3 of 6
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2002 7:47 am
by Dottie
Originally posted by fable
It speaks of how you feel about yourself. Wheras all this off-the-rack, deliberately ill-fitting stuff says how you only want to be part of the masses.
Arent you abit harsh here? I think judgeing peoples self-esteem or gneral comformism rating by the look of thier clothing is jumping to conclusions abit...
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2002 8:35 am
by Bloodstalker
Walks in in a pair of Boxers and a black leather jacket......Hi DW

Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2002 8:41 am
by CM
NO NO NO NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
I am scared for life.
Somebody lance out my eyes now

Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2002 8:54 am
by Ode to a Grasshopper
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2002 8:57 am
by Bloodstalker
Don't worry Ode, you can't really tell the difference anyway

Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2002 8:59 am
by dragon wench
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2002 9:02 am
by fable
Originally posted by Dottie
Arent you abit harsh here? I think judgeing peoples self-esteem or gneral comformism rating by the look of thier clothing is jumping to conclusions abit...
Yes, and I'm just speculating. But I think it holds true, just a bit, at least. I mean, how many people buy and wear the ugliest, least shapely fashions only to be part of the larger clique in their teens, when a self-identity crisis hits one and all? Can't say I blame 'em, but I think it might still be a factor, at least, for some.

Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2002 9:03 am
by Bloodstalker
Sigh....shot down again
I know what you mean, here in Kentucky, we have schoolkids who dress, act like, and talk like little gangsta wannabes. For the life of me, I don't see how they can convince themselves that this is the hood. The whole thing is actually quite funny.

Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2002 9:08 am
by CM
Originally posted by Bloodstalker
Sigh....shot down again
I know what you mean, here in Kentucky, we have schoolkids who dress, act like, and talk like little gangsta wannabes. For the life of me, I don't see how they can convince themselves that this is the hood. The whole thing is actually quite funny.
Whats funnier is when pakistanis or Indians do that.
It is just hilarious, i crack up laughing.
Goodness Gracious me does a very good set of skits with that bit.
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2002 9:20 am
by Dottie
Originally posted by fable
Yes, and I'm just speculating. But I think it holds true, just a bit, at least. I mean, how many people buy and wear the ugliest, least shapely fashions only to be part of the larger clique in their teens, when a self-identity crisis hits one and all? Can't say I blame 'em, but I think it might still be a factor, at least, for some.
That its a factor for some (alot) I cant argue with. I do however as it happens like non shapely clothing.

The more exessive material thats flying around the better. Im just claiming that tastes can differ here, and I dont see myself as very concerned about following fashion atm...

Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2002 9:39 am
by fable
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2002 10:05 am
by Gwalchmai
Re: Baggy clothing.
I, like Fable, am somewhat mystified by this fashion trend. I am happy that here in the Desert Southwest, the trend only really extends to women’s pants, while women still appear to prefer tight-cropped tops. Half a good thing is better than none, I guess. Still, the overall look makes me wonder. I note a growing trend for the young ladies to wear their baggy jeans riding low on the hips, while their thong underwear rides high in back, thus displaying to the world that the fact that the
are wearing a thong. When I see this, I get a little thrill, but almost immediately the thrill is diminished by thoughts of being able to pull the “ultimate wedgie”. Good thing I’m not evil….
Re: Re: Baggy clothing.
I have never understood the trend in men’s shorts (not underwear). Growing up, cut-offs or shorts with a 3” inseam (or less) were accepted. But in the 80s, ‘Jams’ appeared, those big multi-colored shorts that came down to the knee (or below). Ug. What could anyone see in those? It was impossible, and still is, to find a pair of shorts that aren’t impossibly long! Everyone wants to ‘be like Mike’ or so it seems. Sure, Mike Jordan can pull that off because his legs come up to my shoulders, but on stockier guys like me, its just dumb.
Re: Boxers vs. Y-fronts vs. Bikinis vs. Thongs
I am happy to report that I have started wearing more boxers, since they are actually making some that offer a modicum of support. You’ll never catch me in a Bikini, though, @DW.

On women, I find most underwear quite attractive (except for the more ‘matronly’ looks), though I think it takes a particular body-type to make thongs look good (i.e. many 14-year-old girls can pull this off, and that’s just gross

).
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2002 11:20 am
by frogus
Well hell, I dress more like a girl than half the girls I know nowadays...and yes, that is because I'm a ponce, but also because the current rolemodels to young kids (Limp Bizkit etc) are men...the baggily-apparelled kids that we're talking about are, I assume, the kids who listen to Nu Metal...and how many female nu-metallers have you heard of? So the girls that are into the bloke out of Papa Roach just have no choice but to dress like a man, in order to (as Fable says) fit in....
The merge of styles (Gothic and hiphop) is one of the most unfortunate there is...although either can look good when done well on their own.
All that being said, big trousers can still be attractive on a girl if [interior_designer_voice]
Used as part of an elegant ensemble [interior_designer_voice/off]...When all the clothes are too big you have a problem...
re - Dottie's shirt and tie fetish - My sister just got married in a black silk shirt with white stitching and a red bow tie

...
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2002 7:38 pm
by Obsidian
I find the goth look, if pulled off well very attractive. Assuming they have a short skirt. That helps.
Ahem. Anyways, I'm gonna have to go with the summer dress. About mid thigh height and made of something light.
Personnaly, I am not a big fan of the tight pant/shirt trend. If it's going to be skin tight, why can't it be skin? Thats my question. In shirts its ok. On pants, Go for a short skirt. Looks much better.
Hair, also is a kicker imo. Short hair I really like, especially when the tips are died. ie) blond with black tips, or black with red ends I think looks really good.
The most important thing for me though, is that whatever they wear it is distinctive and different. I can't stand the current "trendy looks".
Anything but ordanary plz. Also, a person sense of style says a lot about them . Confident, shy, athletic, etc.
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2002 1:48 pm
by C Elegans
Originally posted by Gwalchmai
I have never understood the trend in men’s shorts (not underwear). Growing up, cut-offs or shorts with a 3” inseam (or less) were accepted. But in the 80s, ‘Jams’ appeared, those big multi-colored shorts that came down to the knee (or below). Ug. What could anyone see in those? It was impossible, and still is, to find a pair of shorts that aren’t impossibly long!
I hope Fable excuse me for discussing what clothes
I don't find sexy: I think most types of shorts, but especially the long baggy ones you describe, are not very attrative on men. A tighter type, like cut of jeans or of course speedos if you are biking, looks much better IMO
On women, I find most underwear quite attractive (except for the more ‘matronly’ looks), though I think it takes a particular body-type to make thongs look good (i.e. many 14-year-old girls can pull this off, and that’s just gross
).
Ah, I don't think you need to have any special body type to wear thongs, you just need to find the right type for your body. I use the totally plain, sort of sporty type with very high and thin cut. Very comfortable if you have a slimmer body type. A bigger woman with wide hips and a large behind may look better in thongs with a farily large triangle in the Y-shape of the back side adn perhaps a rim of lace on the front. IMO it certainly looks better than the bikini type underwear which can accentuate the hip and behind parts and make them look even bigger.
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2002 2:50 pm
by Dottie
Originally posted by Obsidian
Hair, also is a kicker imo. Short hair I really like, especially when the tips are died. ie) blond with black tips, or black with red ends I think looks really good.
This I was hoping for someone else to say...
Since people brought up the subject of what cloths are not that attractive... I have to say - Dresses. In general I find any type of this rather boring, and it get worse if they have some kind of flowery design.
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2002 4:48 pm
by Gruntboy
Good topic fable.
I enjoy oggling girls in tight jeans.
I find the bare-midriff thing worth looking out for in the summer, t-shirts too small, that kind of thing. Basically I'm just a dirty old man trapped in a young man's body.

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2002 4:54 pm
by Minerva
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2002 6:09 pm
by dragon wench
Originally posted by Dottie
This I was hoping for someone else to say...
Since people brought up the subject of what cloths are not that attractive... I have to say - Dresses. In general I find any type of this rather boring, and it get worse if they have some kind of flowery design.
I have to agree with you there, IMO floral print dresses (on either gender

) are truly boring....
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2002 6:13 pm
by Dottie
LOL@DW, I've only seen it once or twice on a man so I thought I couldnt make a good judgement on such a small sample... But you're probably right.
