Page 3 of 11
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2001 5:45 am
by C Elegans
I've met very few attractive men at university. The male psychology students in Sweden must be among the least stylish people int he world. Besides, most of them were overweight. (The women too, for some reason.) Now, all the guest and exchange researchers I meet at work, that's another thing

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2001 5:49 am
by Xandax
Originally posted by Vehemence:
<STRONG>*mental note, never say subject and psychology in the same sentence*
I meant units as in parts of the course. And what do you mean thier? Who are you refering to?

</STRONG>
Well -
Her subject, then - sheeze, can't even use loose gramma anymore

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2001 5:53 am
by Georgi
Hmmm, I think my course is about 50/50 split gender-wise, which is cool. Though I did a course on gender history last year which had about 20 women and 3 guys... I think they felt a bit outnumbered

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2001 5:56 am
by Vehemence
Originally posted by Xandax:
<STRONG>Well -
Her subject, then - sheeze, can't even use loose gramma anymore

</STRONG>
Well I suppose I was her subject... but she flunked and ended up causing some serious restructuring to the subject material.
CE: Well I'm reasonably slim and I'm a psych student

67kgs if anyone's interested

And don't ask me what that is in any other measurement, i only know what it is in kilograms!

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2001 5:57 am
by Xandax
Originally posted by Georgi:
<STRONG>Hmmm, I think my course is about 50/50 split gender-wise, which is cool. Though I did a course on gender history last year which had about 20 women and 3 guys... I think they felt a bit outnumbered

</STRONG>
20/3 ration - Sounds nice
Well not actually - I've always found that 50/50 to 60/40 (female/male) is better.
Otherwise there will either be to much guy-talk or to much girl-scheming

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2001 5:59 am
by Xandax
Originally posted by Vehemence:
<STRONG><snip>And don't ask me what that is in any other measurement, i only know what it is in kilograms!

</STRONG>
Wohoo - Go metric, go metric

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2001 6:00 am
by Vehemence
Originally posted by Georgi:
<STRONG>Hmmm, I think my course is about 50/50 split gender-wise, which is cool. Though I did a course on gender history last year which had about 20 women and 3 guys... I think they felt a bit outnumbered

</STRONG>
I'm sure they didn't mind though

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2001 6:04 am
by Vehemence
Originally posted by Xandax:
<STRONG>Well not actually - I've always found that 50/50 to 60/40 (female/male) is better.
Otherwise there will either be to much guy-talk or to much girl-scheming

</STRONG>
50/50 will do me since that's usually one to one

And that's fine with me

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2001 6:12 am
by C Elegans
@Georgi: I always prefer a approx. 50/50 gender distribution. Both my psych and my med courses were like that, but as always, the "higher" in the academic hierarchy you go, the more male dominated it becomes. When I started working at the lab where I'm now, only one other researcher was female, the other 30 were male. The last 1-2 years it's been better, but my field is still extremely male dominated.
@Veh: 67 kgs? That's no proof of being slim, you could be 1.62 cm tall
@Xan: I agree with the guy/girl-talk stuff, and both are equally boring since they follow predictable stereotype patterns. Zzz...
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2001 6:16 am
by Vehemence
Originally posted by C Elegans:
<STRONG>@Veh: 67 kgs? That's no proof of being slim, you could be 1.62 cm tall

</STRONG>
Actually, I'm 186 cm tall. That proof enough?

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2001 6:32 am
by C Elegans
You are certainly slim, Veh

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2001 6:35 am
by Vehemence
Originally posted by C Elegans:
<STRONG>You are certainly slim, Veh

</STRONG>
Not too slim though right?

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2001 6:50 am
by Georgi
Originally posted by Xandax:
<STRONG>Well not actually - I've always found that 50/50 to 60/40 (female/male) is better.
Otherwise there will either be to much guy-talk or to much girl-scheming

</STRONG>
Yeah, especially when the course is all about how women have suffered male oppression

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2001 6:52 am
by Xandax
Originally posted by Georgi:
<STRONG>Yeah, especially when the course is all about how women have suffered male oppression

</STRONG>
Aaarrgghhhh - *runs away*
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Is it safe to come out again?
[ 09-01-2001: Message edited by: Xandax ]
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2001 6:56 am
by Georgi
Originally posted by Vehemence:
<STRONG>Not too slim though right?

</STRONG>
Too slim for what, though, this is the question.

I mean, if you wanted to be a sumo wrestler or something...

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2001 6:59 am
by Georgi
Originally posted by Xandax:
<STRONG>Aaarrgghhhh - *runs away*
<snip>
Is it safe to come out again?

</STRONG>
ROFL
Sure it's safe, don't worry, we won't bite... hard

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2001 7:01 am
by Xandax
Originally posted by Georgi:
<STRONG>ROFL
Sure it's safe, don't worry, we won't bite... hard

</STRONG>
But you will do it often

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2001 7:03 am
by Georgi
Originally posted by Xandax:
<STRONG>But you will do it often

</STRONG>
But it won't leave any long-term scars...

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2001 7:04 am
by Xandax
Maybe emotional scars - though.

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2001 7:09 am
by Georgi
Originally posted by Xandax:
<STRONG>Maybe emotional scars - though.

</STRONG>
Well, yeah, you have a point there
