GameBanshee Forums

Originally posted by Flagg:
Weasel,

You sick ........, oh well you can't help it. It is not your fault. Just take your pill and everything will get much better.

Who me ...for quoting Randall F

------------------
Greetings from The Weasel!
The Lord Weasel!
The Warrior of the Spamland!
The Ayatollah of Spamolla!

@Flagg - Yes, I forgot to answer your question. Is it intelligence alone I should consider or would cunning come into calculations as well?

It is also difficult to imagine "Weasel" and "innocent pawn" being in the same sentence together.

Originally posted by Osiris:
@Flagg -
It is also difficult to imagine "Weasel" and "innocent pawn" being in the same sentence together.

LMAO...that is so true

------------------
Greetings from The Weasel!
The Lord Weasel!
The Warrior of the Spamland!
The Ayatollah of Spamolla!

Hmm....what could I wear as a knight??The fence would be my horse

@Osiris, Wouldn't you need to have intelligence in order to be cunning???

You don't need to be intelligent to be wise (learnt that from BG2 )

------------------
I lay my claim on the fence

@Flagg - OK, if you want, but what of other characteristics such as devious, treacherous, untrustworthy etc.

@Brink - If you're riding a fence, make sure you do it side-saddle.

Originally posted by Osiris:

@Brink - If you're riding a fence, make sure you do it side-saddle.

LMAO... "Home home on the range"

@Osiris, so we currently have five variables:
Intelligence,
Cunning,
Devious,
Treacherous,
Untrustworthy,

So how would you score Weasel and me on these five variables?

On a scale of 1 to a 100..


Intelligence..80
Cunning..90
Devious..99
Treacherous..101
Untrustworthy..95

Osiris-don't need to,I have a cushion

Weasel-since your scale is only til 100,I'll take that 101 to be 1 (Wow,Weasel's not treacherous!! )
------------------
I lay my claim on the fence

[This message has been edited by Brink (edited 02-18-2001).]

[This message has been edited by Brink (edited 02-18-2001).]

The point here is that to be cunning, devious etc. may be desirable qualities in a thief, but useless (or of limited use) for a rocket scientist. For example Einstein may have been the most intelligent man of the twentieth century, but that does not mean he was the most cunning, devious, treacherous man of the twentieth century.

And besides all that, do seriously you think I am going to rank you and Weasel on different qualities whilst you are both on-line? Perhaps I will e-mail each of you with my results.

@Brink.....Treacherous blew my scale up..

Flagg: I wasn't sticking up for you, I was giving my (unrequested ) opinion as I always do.

Way to go Weasel, leave you at the helm and you loose us a member. With Ubik and GB MIA, this does not bode well.

@Chrissy: You are right I don't like war very much.

Therefore, I'm here watching war from the top of a hill (because it' higher than fence), and see if any offers come to me. If there is any good offer I cannot refuse, I'll join the force, whichever the side it would be.

Minerva: Good! LOL, it's fun... (as long as there isn't any fighting yet... )

Join the Fence

------------------
I lay my claim on the fence

@Minerva, what would it take to convince you?

Originally posted by Flagg:
@Minerva, what would it take to convince you?

Well, that's something you need to find by yourself. Go and have a try...