Originally posted by Sailor Saturn:
<STRONG>@C Elegans I understand what you're saying, but most people take it too far, such as those who dislike him because of his speech mistakes.
</STRONG>
I certainly agree with you that noone should be disliked as a person because of language mistakes. Also, I think formal language mistakes should not overshadow the
content of the speech/writing.
<STRONG>I may not have had the same oppurtunities as Bush, but I've had more than you might realize.
</STRONG>
I'm happy to hear your circumstances have been good, and that you are now heading towards an academic career in very interesting subjects. Good luck both in your studying and your Public Speech course
But still, the possibilites you and I have for improving our speech techniques and speecher skills, are not comparable to what GW Bush has had.
<STRONG>I have a genius IQ, I skipped 11th and 12th grade and went straight to university. I'm going for my Ph.D. in Physics, as well as a B.S. in Computer Science, Linguistics, and either Marine Biology or Psychology. I could, very easily, become far more famous and well known than Bush.
</STRONG>
Originally posted by Sailor Saturn in the other Bush thread: <STRONG>
I pay absolutely no attention to politics or any of that shlit. Thus, I don't know anything about anything Bush has done as President and I don't care to know. However, if "the way (he?) talks" is his accent, I will hunt you down and shoot you, as well as do many other unpleasent things to you.
</STRONG>
Many people distance themselves from modern politicts because they feel it's too complex to grasp, and there's too much information that has to be taken in. Since you describe you have superior studying skills, I really think it's a pity you're so totally uninterested in politics.

The taking in a lot of complex information would probably be a lot easier for you than for many others.
If you're heading towards a career in science, and think you are going to be very famous, it's even more of a pity

I hope you will reconsider in the future, since many scientific fields also raises political concerns. (Just look at the recent stem cell debate, for instance.) As scientists we are constantly pushing the limits by chaning knowledge and seeking new knowledge, and thus, I think we also have certain responsibilities.
Anyway, I'm very sorry to hear you have been treated badly by people because of your language problems. But as Fable says, it's very important to be able to separate interal feelings from one's judgement of others. Hopefully, your studying and the feeling of doing something you like and are interested in, will make this sore point heal
<STRONG> If you're going to hold Bush's speech trouble against him, first make sure you have no speech(including typing what you say here) problems of your own. Otherwise, all you are is a hypocrite.
</STRONG>
Personally, I think this is not a valid argument for not being allowed to critisise Bush's errors. The idea that one should be perfect oneself in order to be allowed to critisise others, is both illogical and unfair to me. It's just a variant of the "two wrongs make a right" issue.
Also, a comment about using other languages that English on this board:
I support Minervas views here. Since this is an international board, I think all of us should post exclusively in English, and if we are to use words in other languages (for instance, because we don't know the English word for something), we should clearly explain the meaning of that word. Posting offensive expression in languages not understood by the majority of the members here, is IMO a cheap way of eluding both reactions from other members and Moderators. I don't think you meant it that way SS, so please refrain from posting Japanese words in the future.
[ 08-23-2001: Message edited by: C Elegans ]