Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2000 10:06 pm
The Jan-or-Nalia question really highlights the master question of how to approach BGII...are you a power-gamer or a role-player? I know people talk about this a bit too much sometimes, and many people tend to be a bit puritanical about it (as if, from a role-playing perspective, you wouldn't want the most powerful group you could muster). But, bottom line (IMHO) is that Nalia is a much better mage than Jan and high thief skills aren't that essential. So Nalia is a "better" choice...right?
Well, hold on there pardner. Jan is a very unusual character. He's a blast to play, and his scripting is fabulous (genius mix of comic and tragic...much better than Cats...I'm going to see it again and again...). So, if you're a role-player at heart, Jan's a great pick for your party.
So asking a question like "who's the best" is very subjective. Beauty of BGII, and one of the things that ups its replayability value, is the great variation in the limited NPC available. (I'm a heretic here: I love that there are much fewer NPC's than in BGI...makes you really pick and choose carefully. There's no "perfect" party, so the role playing is more realistic.)
Stick it to the man.
Well, hold on there pardner. Jan is a very unusual character. He's a blast to play, and his scripting is fabulous (genius mix of comic and tragic...much better than Cats...I'm going to see it again and again...). So, if you're a role-player at heart, Jan's a great pick for your party.
So asking a question like "who's the best" is very subjective. Beauty of BGII, and one of the things that ups its replayability value, is the great variation in the limited NPC available. (I'm a heretic here: I love that there are much fewer NPC's than in BGI...makes you really pick and choose carefully. There's no "perfect" party, so the role playing is more realistic.)
Stick it to the man.