GameBanshee Forums

Oh, great. I wasn't really expecting that many stars. One or MAYBE two'd be more like it.

BTW.. is it GOOD to have many stars? I suppose it is, but in the FAQ it doesn't really say.. it could be the other way around. If so.. thanx a lot! hehe.

Evenin' all

I wouldn't worry about spamming craig's topic if I were you, Edguy, since he has spammed just about everyone else's...

So am I the only person who doesn't bother with the whole stupid user ratings thing? It seems kinda pointless to me...

Originally posted by Georgi:
<STRONG>am I the only person who doesn't bother with the whole stupid user ratings thing? It seems kinda pointless to me...</STRONG>

Hmm. I wonder if Buck would let me change my rating for you... you might be less glib with, say, a 1

Actually, I rarely take notice of my rating, Waverly, you can change it to whatever you want

It's not like I'm going to get all upset and cry if I haven't got 5 stars, and leave the board and never spam here again... (You'll have to think of something else )

@Georgi: I just have rating envy ever since Foul pulled his ratings sabbatage

I still think people's status shouldn't be limited to Member and Exalted member. I'd like to see 'sea cucumber', 'pathetic wanker', or 'desperate loner' when appropriate.

[ 05-30-2001: Message edited by: Waverly ]

Oh great, and give people even more reason to get annoyed about low ratings
Hey maybe people should be allowed to leave anonymous insults with their ratings too!

I haven't bothered rating anyone myself... but if it'll make you feel better, I'll go and rate you

BTW I don't think you'll get banned from the forum, you're far too aware of what you're saying...

I like the anonymous insult idea. There's an email sevice that will do that for you too

I hope Buck considers Waverly(tm) Brand Filth more subtle than overt...

Well, okay, it's not always that subtle... but it's rarely offensive

If 'exalted member' was replaced with other comments, what would yours be, Mr 5165 posts?

I can think of some, but they aren't really *ahem* postable

Originally posted by vixen:
<STRONG>If 'exalted member' was replaced with other comments, what would yours be, Mr 5165 posts? </STRONG>

He was regarded as the Moron by the definition, as far as I can remember...

Originally posted by Minerva:
<STRONG>He was regarded as the Moron by the definition, as far as I can remember...</STRONG>

Where was that definition? I remember seeing it.

But surely king nerd would be more appropriate than moron? Moron implies some sort of character defamation. Which of course we wouldn't wish on Waverly.....

Originally posted by vixen:
<STRONG>Where was that definition? I remember seeing it.
</STRONG>

The original was posted by Ubik, but I think Brink put it in his list.

But surely king nerd would be more appropriate than moron? Moron implies some sort of character defamation. Which of course we wouldn't wish on Waverly.....

ROFL

@Ladies: Very funny This is when the 'Giggling Strumpet' member status would come in handy As for Waverly, I don't know... I don't think I like the options 5000 posts is not healthy, methinks..

Whatever rank that you give Waverly,I would be affected as well

Originally posted by Brink:
<STRONG>Whatever rank that you give Waverly,I would be affected as well </STRONG>

And Weasel also. So we'd better make it nice. How about 'expressive GB member'?

Double post. How special. Like a double yolk egg.



[ 05-30-2001: Message edited by: vixen ]

vixen-

@vixen: I think anyone with 3000+ posts should be called simply 'mad'....

Originally posted by Minerva:
<STRONG>@vixen: I think anyone with 3000+ posts should be called simply 'mad'....</STRONG>

Don't be harsh on yourself. I will be there shortly if I don't get on with some work soon...!