Page 629 of 1703
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 12:20 am
by TonyMontana1638
Alright... So how're the dingos?

Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 12:22 am
by Fiona
Defeatist

Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 12:24 am
by TonyMontana1638
[QUOTE=Fiona]Defeatist

[/QUOTE]
Cynic

Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 12:35 am
by dj_venom
Me - Silent

.
The latest news about dingoes: About a month back a 2 year old girl was mauled to death by their pet dog, it had a bit of dingo blood in it. Quite sad

.
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 12:39 am
by Fiona
No fair! I am trying very hard to understand what is going on and believe me it is not easy. DJ gave definition of sophist which was adequate to my original, admittedly unexciting, point. There follows a couple of posts which strike me as cryptic (perhaps due to drinK) then suddenly I an confronted with Plato. A wee ,aristocratic, arrogant Prince Charles lookalike if ever I saw one. Am I being asked to choose between sophists and Plato? Cos if I am it is a point of precedence between a flea and a louse. Or if something else is going on can someone please explain *cries in a corner*

Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 12:43 am
by TonyMontana1638
My God this is the most vulnerable I think I've ever seen Fiona :speech: . Good thing Mag isn't here...
I'm not entirely certain where the Plato came from either: I know he spoke extensively on the subject, but I'm not sure how his definition entered the exchange. *shrug* I'm inclined to believe DJV was just name-dropping.
That's horrible, is the dingo blood to blame? Here I was just being cheeky: the equivalent of jumping in an icebox when I was expecting a sauna.

Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 12:45 am
by dj_venom
Whoa, I can actually make people cry? Never knew.
[url="http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=sophist"]Here, this might help.[/url]
Yeah, I know you were, but we often have dingo news. I think it is, and, under law, having dingo blood rules the dog as ferae naturae, meaning, a wild animal. So I'd say would have to have played some part in it.
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 12:52 am
by Fiona
Oh I see. He did too. They got wages, so they were clearly bad hats as far as he was concerned. I suspect they wore red braces but I do not particularly condemn them for that. He might well have made duchy originals and is therefore not especially an authority I would like to rely on.
How did this happen?

Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 12:55 am
by dj_venom
No idea, I think the dog just randomly became aggressive and attacked the nearest thing, being the girl.
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 12:59 am
by TonyMontana1638
[QUOTE=Fiona]Oh I see. He did too. They got wages, so they were clearly bad hats as far as he was concerned. I suspect they wore red braces but I do not particularly condemn them for that. He might well have made duchy originals and is therefore not especially an authority I would like to rely on. [/QUOTE]
Gazuntheit
Were the parents aware it had dingo blood in it?
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 12:59 am
by Fiona
Canny speak any more, I am told by a reliable source. Going to bed
good night people
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 1:01 am
by TonyMontana1638
[QUOTE=Fiona]Canny speak any more, I am told by a reliable source. Going to bed
good night people[/QUOTE]
No, that's not what I meant! Dammit!
*sigh* Goodnight Fiona

.
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 1:02 am
by dj_venom
I think so, there are many people that want the dingo blood, to get the features etc. However, a court case has ruled that if you have it, it's considered wild, which means any damage it causes you are completely liable, so you have to becareful owning them.
Good night Fiona.
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 1:05 am
by TonyMontana1638
That's just irresponsible then, to have a small child like that and place an acknowledged wild animal around her (even if it's housebroken). My mom had a beautiful malamute dog when she was pregnant with me that she adored but got rid of her after she began to get aggressive with her because she didn't want it around baby me.
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 1:07 am
by dj_venom
Yeah, well you can tame them, but they always have the streak in them. I guess some people just never know.
And are you the reliable source by any chance?
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 1:11 am
by TonyMontana1638
[QUOTE=dj_venom]Yeah, well you can tame them, but they always have the streak in them. I guess some people just never know.
And are you the reliable source by any chance?[/QUOTE]
I understand and hind-sight is a damn fine thing...
I fear I am: I meant it in jest but... Lord knows I'd rather have a drunk Fiona than none at all!
In my defense if she considers me to be 'reliable' then...

Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 1:12 am
by dj_venom
*nods* Hind-sight is bliss.
Can I know the details, or is it private (I think private, seeing as it was a private message). I just have the feeling I'm part to blame by confusing the whole lot of us.
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 1:15 am
by TonyMontana1638
It was in PM but it had nothing to do with you, outside of the fact that you are a fellow poster in the paedophilia thread. Nothing important really, but learn from my mistakes: if you ever feel like fecetiously adding snide comments in a postscript, just don't.

Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 1:19 am
by dj_venom
Don't worry about it Tony, Fiona doesn't hold grudges, she's just going off for now (it is quite late there). Come your next spam, you two will be as right as rain.
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 1:26 am
by TonyMontana1638
[QUOTE=dj_venom]Don't worry about it Tony, Fiona doesn't hold grudges, she's just going off for now (it is quite late there). Come your next spam, you two will be as right as rain.[/QUOTE]
Oh I'm sure, but just because I worry everyone hates me doesn't mean they don't... Catch my meaning?
Hah, now I'm just being annoying.
