Register Lost Password?  Cookie?
  The time now is 02:45 AM GMT -6.  
Banshee Network
 
Quick Links
 
 
GameBanshee Swag
Site Features
Submit News
News Archives
Join Our Staff
Forums
Community Blogs
Reviews
Previews
Interviews
Editorials
About GB
Advertise With Us!
Advertisement
 
Go Back   GameBanshee Forums > Forum Categories > RPGs > Vampire: TM - Redemption

Reply
GameBanshee Forums  
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2005, 09:37 PM
Exalted Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 680
Recent GameBanshee Review.

I liked reading your review, thou I think mistaken for giving it a 7 for graphics.
You are reviewing a 6 year old game, at the time it was a very grapically advanced RPG.
The quake engine had never looked so good, there were actually colors other than gray, brown and green
The cutscences were considered very good they used a technique to strech and blend the textures which made the charaters seem more rounded which if I am not mistaken had not ever been done in a video game before.

I humbly suggest you reevaluate your score, as an example look at the Baldurs Gate review it has a 9 and there is no comparsion as Redemption looks much better.
If you did not play games 6 years ago then mabye try comparing Redemption to other 6 year old game you will find it was in the 85% to 90% range compared to other titles visually, 7 is extremely to low.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2005, 01:40 AM
Aegis's Avatar
Exalted Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Soviet Canuckistan
Posts: 13,431
Send a message via MSN to Aegis
There is more to graphics score than simply the outward appearance. For instance, the Infinity engine received the score it did for BG2, considering the limitations imposed upon it, being both 2-dimensional, as well as isometric. While in Redemption, the engine was hardly fully utilized for what it was capable of doing, combined with clunky animations, and often, very static animations. In stills, yes it looked quite impressive for it's time. In motion, well, it had been done better in other games.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2005, 01:43 PM
Exalted Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 680
"graphics score than simply the outward appearance"

Sounds reasonable, yet you are still holding Redemption to a higher standard of results even thou it looks better graphiclly, even the animations, than others at the time.
Considering Nihilistic rebuilt the engine to be capable of doing a completly different gender than the engine was designed to do and created the best looking RPG of its time, seems extremely unfair.
Not to mention they did the Multiplayer funtional visually as well, with the same great look and style, which to date has not been toped, in a White Wolf style Vampire game.
It also means there was room to grow the engine more in sequals which Activison completly screwed up, just as they have for Bloodlines.

To me it seems like your saying, as an example that because Sith Lords was on the same engine it should get a higher score grapiclly than KotOR since it was using more grapic intensive because they pushed the older crapper engine harder instead of using an updated version with room to grow.


"hardly fully utilized for what it was capable of doing"

Possibly, yet can you ever think of another quake engine game made for that 3rd person/behind view or any RPG that looked better at the time?
Please if you can think of a single one let me know, as I would truly like to play it, since I am still a fan of Redemption as well.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



 
      Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 2000-2008 GameBanshee.com