| |

10-22-2002, 11:35 AM
|
 | Super Moderator | | Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: The sun, the moon, and the stars.
Posts: 30,320
| |
|
I have been attempting for the last few days, during quiet hours, to determine exactly what Sadam Hussein wanted to achieve by his one-party election and supposed 100% vote of confidence. He's far from being a delusional idiot like Kazakhstan's Niyazov. So what could be motivating him to announce something that a child of ten would find silly?
The process is transparently fraudulent. Western democracies have been snickering about it in their respective halls of power. Other MidEastern nations have ignored the matter. I'm sure that authoritarian regimes are wondering why Hussein went to all the effort. Even Castro never bothered to proclaim 100% support.
Apropos of all this, a BBC correspondent stationed in Baghdad relayed the other day a joke making the underground rounds: it seems an old man, left alone for a moment in the polling station at the end of day and fed up with Hussein, voted "No" for his reelection. Later, on his way home, he second thoughts. The old man wondered if perhaps the single opposition vote could be traced to his presence; so he hurried back to the polling station. Tearfully, he told the authorities, "I made a mistake. I'm very old, and I think I may have accidentally put in a mark rejecting our glorious Leader instead of supporting him."
"Don't worry, old man," the officials replied. "Go home: be at peace. We've already changed it for you."
Does anybody have any idea why Hussein proclaimed his 100% support rate on a huge voter turnout? Is this just the "last hurrah" of a man in desparate straits, watching a world power search for reasons to invade?
__________________ To the Righteous belong the fruits of violent victory. The rest of us will have to settle for warm friends, warm lovers, and a wink from a quietly supportive universe. |