| |

01-15-2006, 02:42 PM
|
 | Super Moderator | | Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: The sun, the moon, and the stars.
Posts: 30,320
| |
Quote: |
Originally Posted by Fiona I actually thought this wouldn't be allowed in the US. Did Bush not do it surreptitiously? | Yes, he did. The executive branch of the judiciary (not to be confused with the Supreme Court, which Bush would dearly love to control--and just might, soon) has moved from becoming a prosecutorial wing dedicated to nation-based consumer advocacy to defending the president at all costs, and that's why everybody's settling in for a long, hard legal battle on this issue. Bush is basically using money initially slated for taxpayer-related concerns to argue in favor of anti-taxpayer, anti-civil rights practices: our government is filled with these ironies.
__________________ To the Righteous belong the fruits of violent victory. The rest of us will have to settle for warm friends, warm lovers, and a wink from a quietly supportive universe. |