RPG Search

 
 
 
 
 
 
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 01-13-2005, 07:05 PM
Magrus's Avatar
Exalted Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 16,953
Send a message via AIM to Magrus Send a message via MSN to Magrus Send a message via Yahoo to Magrus
Sometimes I wonder how inter-connected the big corporations are with governments. I've a mind for business, and with some family history with the Mafia, well. A good number of local businesses here are by no means legal and I have no legal education around here, so if I can see that just by understanding business aspects naturally, how is it they continue to do what they do? Thats just small businesses, nothing major or huge.

I can't imagine what larger corporations or the government hides and gets away with and no one ends up the wiser for it.

Keeping certain departments of a business ignorant of each other is simply a means to keep company secrets from totally being spread outside the company. Granted, someone may share what they know of their department, but if they're ignorant of the five or six other departments, damage in leaking information is minimalized. It prevents them from breaking off and striking out on their own as serious competition also.
Reply With Quote
 
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2005, 10:33 AM
jopperm2's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: I'm from Iowa, I just work in space.. Okay the Spa
Posts: 2,815
We do it mostly so individuals are not held responsible for things by the customer. If I tell a customer that I'm going to have something sent to them, and I forget to send it, they'll call back, I tell them I sent the request, they can't talk to who sends it because I don't have a phone number for them. I tell them it was sent and the post office must have lost it. In other words, not my problem. It works well.
__________________
"Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one."

Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
 
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2005, 06:58 PM
Magrus's Avatar
Exalted Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 16,953
Send a message via AIM to Magrus Send a message via MSN to Magrus Send a message via Yahoo to Magrus
So it's to improve customer service then, I see.
Reply With Quote
 
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2005, 07:05 PM
jopperm2's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: I'm from Iowa, I just work in space.. Okay the Spa
Posts: 2,815
Yeah, that or to hunt people down that don't give us our money.
__________________
"Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one."

Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
 
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2005, 07:25 PM
Magrus's Avatar
Exalted Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 16,953
Send a message via AIM to Magrus Send a message via MSN to Magrus Send a message via Yahoo to Magrus
I did that earlier, it was fun.
Reply With Quote
 
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2005, 08:11 AM
jopperm2's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: I'm from Iowa, I just work in space.. Okay the Spa
Posts: 2,815
Hunted someone down?
__________________
"Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one."

Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
 
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2005, 11:34 AM
Magrus's Avatar
Exalted Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 16,953
Send a message via AIM to Magrus Send a message via MSN to Magrus Send a message via Yahoo to Magrus
Indeed, he owes me a grand.
Reply With Quote
 
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2005, 04:03 AM
Silur's Avatar
Exalted Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Home of the straw men
Posts: 907
I found this link this morning, and it really is scary stuff.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ik911
www.costofwar.com

The costs of a ridiculous war, somewhere far, far away...
...and I believe it was motivated in part as being a humanitarian effort. If Saddam killed as many people as famine does in 6 years, the population of Iraq would be somewhere in the negatives.
__________________
The direct use of force is such a poor solution to any problem, it is generally employed only by small children and large nations David Friedman
Reply With Quote
 
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2005, 07:37 AM
ik911's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Having an alibi.
Posts: 4,249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silur
I found this link this morning, and it really is scary stuff.
(...)
...and I believe it was motivated in part as being a humanitarian effort. If Saddam killed as many people as famine does in 6 years, the population of Iraq would be somewhere in the negatives.
Too bad the people are so reluctant to revolt nowadays. What would've happened if this leaked out in the 60s and 70s eh?

What have we become...
Reply With Quote
 
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2005, 07:47 AM
fable's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The sun, the moon, and the stars.
Posts: 30,707
Quote:
Originally Posted by ik911
Too bad the people are so reluctant to revolt nowadays. What would've happened if this leaked out in the 60s and 70s eh?
We would have had plenty of Kent State Massacres. Besides, even in the 1960s the counter-culture was a small section of society: a portion of the youthful portion of the urban portion of the US. Those folks in Nebraska will still firm in their beliefs that their values would save the US.

And now, we're getting to watch it work out. Lucky us.
__________________
To the Righteous belong the fruits of violent victory. The rest of us will have to settle for warm friends, warm lovers, and a wink from a quietly supportive universe.
Reply With Quote
 
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2005, 07:52 AM
Silur's Avatar
Exalted Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Home of the straw men
Posts: 907
Quote:
Originally Posted by ik911
Too bad the people are so reluctant to revolt nowadays. What would've happened if this leaked out in the 60s and 70s eh?
Im surprised at the amount of time and effort some people spend on defending their second amendment right to carry firearms, without for a second observing the reason why the founding fathers decided to put this right into the constitution...

I did some googling, and found that the Iraqui population is around 25 million, and the number of deaths due to starvation worldwide is about 13 million persons per year, so my estimation was grossly understated.
__________________
The direct use of force is such a poor solution to any problem, it is generally employed only by small children and large nations David Friedman
Reply With Quote
 
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2005, 07:58 AM
ik911's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Having an alibi.
Posts: 4,249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silur
I did some googling, and found that the Iraqui population is around 25 million, and the number of deaths due to starvation worldwide is about 13 million persons per year, so my estimation was grossly understated.
Besides, you could spend a part of that money on long term projects.

Oh, we mustn't forget that overthrowing the Iraqi government is also a long-term project. Except that it won't help the starving people if anyone at all.
Reply With Quote
 
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2005, 09:15 AM
Magrus's Avatar
Exalted Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 16,953
Send a message via AIM to Magrus Send a message via MSN to Magrus Send a message via Yahoo to Magrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by ik911
Too bad the people are so reluctant to revolt nowadays. What would've happened if this leaked out in the 60s and 70s eh?

What have we become...
The only feasible way a revolt would work, is on a scale that the public revolting was ridiculously high, and the soldiers balked at shooting their loved ones and stood down, or sided with them.

Someone toting around their 22 rifle going after a squad of soldiers with automatic weapons just won't work. One soldier yes, 3, maybe, but a squad, no.

Not to mention, I highly doubt those IN power would want to be out. It would be oh so very easy for them to scream "terrorist" and use extreme measures of force to put down any attempt at rebellion.

It IS possible, just likes it's possible the Canadians are secretely amassing troops to take over the world in 5 years. Just extremely unlikely.
__________________
"You can do whatever you want to me."
"Oh, so I can crate you and hide you in the warehouse at the end of Raiders?"
"So funny, kiss me funny boy!" / *Sprays mace* " I know, I know, bad for the ozone"
Reply With Quote
 
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2005, 09:41 AM
Silur's Avatar
Exalted Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Home of the straw men
Posts: 907
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magrus
The only feasible way a revolt would work, is on a scale that the public revolting was ridiculously high, and the soldiers balked at shooting their loved ones and stood down, or sided with them.

Someone toting around their 22 rifle going after a squad of soldiers with automatic weapons just won't work. One soldier yes, 3, maybe, but a squad, no.

Not to mention, I highly doubt those IN power would want to be out. It would be oh so very easy for them to scream "terrorist" and use extreme measures of force to put down any attempt at rebellion.

It IS possible, just likes it's possible the Canadians are secretely amassing troops to take over the world in 5 years. Just extremely unlikely.
So basically what you're saying is that the US people has the same chance against its own oppressive government as the Iraquis did against theirs? Need some UN help?
__________________
The direct use of force is such a poor solution to any problem, it is generally employed only by small children and large nations David Friedman
Reply With Quote
 
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2005, 09:46 AM
Magrus's Avatar
Exalted Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 16,953
Send a message via AIM to Magrus Send a message via MSN to Magrus Send a message via Yahoo to Magrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silur
So basically what you're saying is that the US people has the same chance against its own oppressive government as the Iraquis did against theirs? Need some UN help?
Uh-huh. I got into a very heated argument with an ex-army man about a month back about that actually. I brought up what was going on and my thought of it just being a matter of time before the UN decided to pull down our government. He wasn't happy and rattled on his idiot ideas and I walked away. It was like talking to a cross between Bush and the head of the KKK.
__________________
"You can do whatever you want to me."
"Oh, so I can crate you and hide you in the warehouse at the end of Raiders?"
"So funny, kiss me funny boy!" / *Sprays mace* " I know, I know, bad for the ozone"
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump