RPG Search

 
 
 
 
 

And now, it's time for a headache!  
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-22-2004, 05:49 AM
Vicsun's Avatar
Exalted Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: liberally sprinkled in the film's opening scene
Posts: 4,528
Send a message via MSN to Vicsun
Please explain the following, because I failed to do so and it's driving me mad.

Code:
16 - 36 = 25 - 45 	//+81/4

16 - 36 + 81/4 = 25 - 45 + 81/4

4^2 - 2 * 4 * 9/2 + (9/2)^2 = 5^2 - 2 * 5 * 9/2 + (9/2)^2

4 - 9/2 = 5 - 9/2		//+9/2

4 = 5
__________________
Vicsun, I certainly agree with your assertion that you are an unpleasant person. ~Chanak

Reply With Quote
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-22-2004, 06:15 AM
Lost One's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Brasil
Posts: 475
To me, it looks like the working out from the 3rd line to the 4th line makes no sense.

There's no way to explain it, except that the calculation is wrong. As both sides start equal, everything done to both will ultimately result in both still being equal.
Reply With Quote
 
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-22-2004, 07:35 AM
Vicsun's Avatar
Exalted Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: liberally sprinkled in the film's opening scene
Posts: 4,528
Send a message via MSN to Vicsun
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lost One
To me, it looks like the working out from the 3rd line to the 4th line makes no sense.
It does.
(a + b)^2 = a^2 + 2ab + b^2
And what you have is basically a=4 b= -9/2 on the left side and a=5 b= -9/2 on the right side.

Between line 3 and line 4 one can insert:
(4 - 9/2)^2 = (5 - 9/2)^2 //sqrt

Quote:
There's no way to explain it, except that the calculation is wrong. As both sides start equal, everything done to both will ultimately result in both still being equal.
The calculation is indeed wrong, but I can't figure out what's wrong with it. That's why I posted here.

edit: I'm guessing the solution has got something to do with the fact that you can't square-root the above. But I'm still confused as to why.
__________________
Vicsun, I certainly agree with your assertion that you are an unpleasant person. ~Chanak


Last edited by Vicsun; 08-22-2004 at 07:38 AM.
Reply With Quote
 
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-22-2004, 08:17 AM
fable's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The sun, the moon, and the stars.
Posts: 30,324
I've asked my wife to look at it. She does algorithms in her head to avoid long division, so she comes under the aegis of scary mathheads in my book. I'll post whatever she says.

EDIT: She doesn't know what the "//" stands for. Can you explain, please?
__________________
To the Righteous belong the fruits of violent victory. The rest of us will have to settle for warm friends, warm lovers, and a wink from a quietly supportive universe.

Last edited by fable; 08-22-2004 at 08:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
 
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-22-2004, 10:16 AM
Lost One's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Brasil
Posts: 475
Quote:
Originally Posted by fable
EDIT: She doesn't know what the "//" stands for. Can you explain, please?
Took me a while to get that too. I thought it meant double division initially, but it's actually just a separator, and what comes after it, is what he's going to do to both sides of the equation.

Quote:
It does.
(a + b)^2 = a^2 + 2ab + b^2
And what you have is basically a=4 b= -9/2 on the left side and a=5 b= -9/2 on the right side.

Between line 3 and line 4 one can insert:
(4 - 9/2)^2 = (5 - 9/2)^2 //sqrt
Hah, gotta love these tricky maths questions. Now that I understand better what you did, yes, you did go wrong, but it was actually before the square rooting. In fact, you were wrong at the third line.

When you made 16 into 4^2, 25 into 5^2, and 81/4 into 9/2....you forgot the minus from the equation.

16 is not equal to only (+4)^2. It is also equal to (-4)^2.

Thus, strictly speaking, your equation from the second line should have become:

(+-4)^2 - 2 * 4 * 9/2 + (+-9/2)^2 = (+-)5^2 - 2 * 5 * 9/2 + (+-9/2)^2

So, when you transform that into the form of (4 - 9/2)^2 = (5 - 9/2)^2, you are only taking positive values for a & b. And that is where you go wrong and why you couldn't square root the squared brackets.
Reply With Quote
 
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-22-2004, 11:50 AM
Vicsun's Avatar
Exalted Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: liberally sprinkled in the film's opening scene
Posts: 4,528
Send a message via MSN to Vicsun
Ahh... that makes sense. I will sleep comfortably tonight knowing that one of the greater mysteries plaguing my life has been solved.
__________________
Vicsun, I certainly agree with your assertion that you are an unpleasant person. ~Chanak

Reply With Quote
 
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-22-2004, 01:09 PM
Rob-hin's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: In the Batcave with catwoman. *prrrr*
Posts: 4,832
Send a message via MSN to Rob-hin
Train A leaves Chicago at 45 miles an hour blah die blah...

I truly hate math like this equasion and all math like it.
__________________
Guinness is good for you.
Gives you strength.
Reply With Quote
Trickier than I thought  
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-22-2004, 05:31 PM
Lost One's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Brasil
Posts: 475
While what I have said earlier is true, it doesn't stop the fact that using positive values should give a correct answer, if not a complete one.

After all, (4 - 9/2)^2 = (5 - 9/2)^2 is still true as both sides are equal to another.

Much like (1 - 2)^2 = (3 - 2)^2 and yet, if you square root both sides,

1 - 2 = 3 - 2 or 1 = 3

Clearly not true. This is because while you can square two sides to achieve the same answer, after your equation has become quadratic (you squared it, and now it has more than one solution) then you can't really attempt to prove your original equation backwards by square rooting both sides. Square rooting a quadratic equation always gives more than one answer.

so, +-sqrt(1 - 2)^2 = +-sqrt(3 - 2)^2

the answer is +-(1 - 2) = +-(3 - 2)

which gives, for +, -1 = +1 or +1 = -1....thus, the solution to this quadratic equation (by square rooting both sides) is +1, -1 (you cannot separate the -2s by adding 2 to each side). Note that the difference between the solutions +1 and -1 is equal to 2. Looking back to 1 = 3, 2 is exactly what differentiates them.

Going back to your equation, (4 - 9/2)^2 = (5 - 9/2)^2.

That should be the same as +-(4 - 9/2) = +-(5 - 9/2)

so, for + values, -1/2 = +1/2 and for - values, +1/2 = -1/2. The two solutions to your quadratic equation are +1/2, -1/2. The difference between each solution is 1. Looking back to 4 = 5, 1 is exactly what differentiates them.

So, my point? You cannot prove a single-solution equation by working backwards from a quadratic equation.

eg: 3 = 3..........3^2 = 3^2.........9 = 9

But sqrt(9) = +-3 (so you can't prove your first equation 3 = 3 by going backwards). But even so, there are ways to make sense out of it. In the meantime, I'm going to need a headache pill myself.

Last edited by Lost One; 08-22-2004 at 05:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump