| | | Advertisement |  | | | |  | GameBanshee Forums
| | 
10-09-2004, 09:57 PM
| | Member | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Montreal
Posts: 1
| | | Beorunna's Well: Temple of Tyr Hi!
In chapter 3, Beorunna's Well: Temple of Tyr, I have a problem with Edegar. Everyone else raise a burning torch. He doeesn't have the sword, but won't raise the torch. What's wrong with him... or with me? | 
10-10-2004, 03:00 AM
|  | Super Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Denmark
Posts: 13,376
| | | Well - if you get both withness' real testemonies you shouldn't have much problem winning the trial unanimous.
Just stay away from any dialog lines in the trial that are race related.
(I can't remember the excat dialog tree, possible somebody else can so this is best advice I can give at the moment) | 
10-10-2004, 07:06 AM
|  | Exalted Member | | Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Looking down from ethereal skies
Posts: 4,016
| | | I think you have to stay away from the alcohol related questions too. | 
10-10-2004, 10:32 AM
|  | Exalted Member | | Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Sighlark
Posts: 147
| | Not necessarily - anything related to booze will usually grant you that one soldiers consent... I had a quite haphazard strategy, but it workd out nonetheless. Still, I found the trial to be one of the most difficult challenges in the game...
Unanimously? That is even possible?
Ok, I still hear something new about this game every now and then.
-Zel | 
10-10-2004, 10:43 AM
|  | Super Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Denmark
Posts: 13,376
| | Unanimously is quite possible yes.
First time I did the quest, I ended up loosing it and was surprised because it was about the first challenged I've recived in the game 
So I reloaded, and got him aquitted, but not unanimously, but was happy enough and played along
Second run through the game I remembered the fun with that quest, and with some try and error I managed to get an unanimous aquittle.
But this is a long time ago by now, so I can't remember the dialog tree anymore. | 
10-10-2004, 12:15 PM
|  | Exalted Member | | Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Looking down from ethereal skies
Posts: 4,016
| | | I remember that if you say that it was the booze that made Rolkan (or whatever his name was) kill that other guy, the members will find him guilty, but if you say that his drink was "spoiled", they will find him innocent | 
10-12-2004, 07:29 AM
| | Exalted Member | | Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 142
| | | The walkthorough explains all, except for why when I reloaded the game, although I had saved before doing the trial, I was not allowed to do it again. I unfortuantely went down the wrong path in which I made him to be a drunked crazed thief. I can't remember if he was torn apart by the mob or put to death by the judges. Anyway, I felt really guilty and tried again, but I wasn't allowed back in the the room, and everyone I spoke to told me what a pity it was that he'd died.
__________________
"And she'll be facing......VODKA! Over to John Anderson."
| 
10-12-2004, 08:12 AM
|  | Super Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Denmark
Posts: 13,376
| | Because they (Bioware) defined that you can't break the convesation in the trial withouth dire consequences.
The priest guy that runs it also tells you this before you start the trial  | 
10-14-2004, 07:06 AM
| | Exalted Member | | Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 142
| | | Ah.....I don't think I explained that properly. I saved the game just before going to Neur...Nevik...The chap who gives you the quest. Then I went and spoke to him (basically I thought that if I messed up, I could reload the game). So then Relik...Reruik...the prisoner got torn apart and I thought, "Whoops, let's try again". Reloaded and tried to do the quest again. I was told the prisoner was dead. What happened?
__________________
"And she'll be facing......VODKA! Over to John Anderson."
| | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | |