Register Lost Password?  Cookie?
  The time now is 06:50 AM GMT -6.  
Banshee Network
 
Quick Links
 
 
GameBanshee Swag
Site Features
Submit News
News Archives
Join Our Staff
Forums
Community Blogs
Reviews
Previews
Interviews
Editorials
About GB
Advertise With Us!
Advertisement
 
Go Back   GameBanshee Forums > Forum Categories > News & Feedback > GameBanshee News

Reply
GameBanshee Forums  
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2008, 12:39 PM
GameBanshee News's Avatar
News ID
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 25,275
Post World of Warcraft Cost 200 Million USD Since 2004

Looking at an analyst conference call, Kotaku reports that WoW has cost Blizzard 200 million USD since 2004.
$200 million. Or, at least that's what Blizzard disclosed during yesterday's analyst conference call.

That's it. Staff payroll, hardware support, customer service (which, interestingly, they say is their largest department), the lot. Well, mostly - we think they're just talking the upkeep costs, not the original development costs. Sure, in isolation $200 million is a lot of clams, but when you put $200 million in the "expenditures" column then put $300 gazillion in the "revenue" column, you're not just laughing all the way to the bank, you're cackling.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2008, 12:23 AM
Xandax's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Denmark
Posts: 13,376
Blog Entries: 12
Everybody has always known that a "successful" MMO is a cash-cow and that especially WoW with its groundbreaking subscriptions numbers was a huge one at that.

But many also seem to fail miserable if they do not get success. Funcom looks to be - perhaps not in trouble as such - but seriously hit by AoC for example, or Sigil who got bought by SOE because they messed up Vanguard and so on.

Many producers wants to make a MMO because it is cash-cows..... if they work
__________________
"Software is too complicated, and too big, and too costly and too difficult to let users have anything to do with it!"
Svelmoe - Blogging about SQL, Technology and many other things
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2008, 02:07 AM
Brother None's Avatar
GameBanshee Editor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Liberty City, the Netherlands
Posts: 821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xandax View Post
But many also seem to fail miserable if they do not get success. Funcom looks to be - perhaps not in trouble as such - but seriously hit by AoC for example, or Sigil who got bought by SOE because they messed up Vanguard and so on.
You forget NCSoft's massive closures due to Tabula Rasa. Though there was more wrong there than it being an MMO.

FunCom might be in a lot of trouble. Remember all those ugly financial reports leading up to AoC? They really needed a hit. The sales were really good, but if they then started really investing in the long-term the current leaking of players (at least I assume AoC is leaking players) will hurt.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2008, 02:47 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 6
MMORPG is very expensive to make if you are serious about everything involved.

I'm not least surprised when it's said that the customer service sector is the biggest, just imagine how many times you try to keep the GMs in contact.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2008, 02:50 AM
Exalted Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 62
I find this number a little questionable. Aside from the fact that any "conference call" that had press involved would not include a number like that, I remember seeing figures on EverQuest back in the day (as in back when EQ was the MMOG market, pre-AC even). Granted that internet costs have changed a lot since then, but their actual profit was about 10% of the subscription fee, the biggest expenditure being internet server costs. Unless Blizzard has somehow acquired a good chunk of the backbone, I can't see any way around them paying someone a massive amount of money in connection fees.

Which is not to say that they're not making money hand over fist, but $50M/year is way too small a number to take at face value.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


 
      Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
© 2000-2008 GameBanshee.com