Keeping Faith in Fallout 3

[GameBanshee News]

David Wilgoose from the Official XBox Magazine recently went by Bethesda's offices for his hands-on experience of Fallout 3, and now offers some thoughts on his blog on why we should have faith in Bethesda's Fallout 3.

Bethesda has to combat all these factors. They have to bring a new Fallout into a world where multi-platform development is vital; where RPGs flounder without production values as high as the next big budget FPS; where many of the play mechanics of the original games now seem anachronistic; and where Bethesda has charted out their own successful course of what a role-playing game can be.

Other games and developers have survived such battles though, and perhaps more often than you think. Ion Storm took over development duties from Looking Glass for the third Thief game, although there was certainly some cross-pollination between the companies. Still, Thief: Deadly Shadows turned out to be quite a different experience to what the Looking Glass folks had envisaged. It kept some of the open world structure of the original design, but reined it back and applied a more discrete mission progression. Ion Storm were faced with the additional challenge of developing for a console as well as PC which no doubt had an impact, especially from a technology point of view. But ultimately, Deadly Shadows was a genuine Thief game, just served with superior lighting and some minor tweaks to the mechanics.

In a similar vein, Obsidian assumed responsibility from Bioware for both Neverwinter Nights and Knight of the Old Republic. Those guys had worked closely together at Interplay’s Black Isle RPG division and the development of both series continued fairly seamlessly. Fundamentally, the sequels really aren’t that different and, for the most part, merely benefit from newer technology.

Essentially he lists a lot of successful instances of franchises changing hands or style, doesn't mention any of the many times such a change failed, and concludes we should be happy.

Spotted on Fallout 3:APNB.

[DesR85]

Quite a number of these examples mentioned have people who worked on previous games in the series before (or at the very least co-operated with the people who made those games). How are they comparable to Bethseda? I don't recall of hearing anyone there ever worked on the Fallout series before.

[Brother None]

Originally Posted by DesR85

How are they comparable to Bethseda? I don't recall of hearing anyone there ever worked on the Fallout series before.

Nope, no one. It's a public secret a former lead Fallout dev applied to Bethesda and...well...no reply.

These are all sequels that either did not change as much in gameplay mechanics as Fallout 3 is doing compared to Fallout 2, as well as examples that often involved the original creators.

But to be fair to the guy, there just aren't that many situations that are more directly comparable to Fallout 3. The situation just is fairly unique. That doesn't mean comparisons shouldn't be drawn, it just means they should be drawn fairly.