Register Lost Password?  Cookie?
  The time now is 06:26 AM GMT -6.  
Banshee Network
 
Quick Links
 
 
GameBanshee Swag
Site Features
Submit News
News Archives
Join Our Staff
Forums
Community Blogs
Reviews
Previews
Interviews
Editorials
About GB
Advertise With Us!
Advertisement
 
Go Back   GameBanshee Forums > Forum Categories > News & Feedback > GameBanshee News

Reply
GameBanshee Forums  
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-27-2008, 02:13 PM
GameBanshee News's Avatar
News ID
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 25,275
Post Artificial Idiocy

An indepth article on Next Generation looks at the state of AI and argues that usability for games should take precedence of developing "real AI".
A large part of this is consistency – in fact when we complain about stupid AI, and toss the controller across the floor in disgust, we are more often than not referring to anomalies in its behavior rather than an actual lack of intelligence. When an eagle-eyed enemy improbably spots you while you believe yourself to be adequately hidden, or when opponents manage to track you down with the insistence of a psychic beagle – these are the things that jar with the player’s understanding of the world and drag him or her out of it.

“I think pathfinding is an area that used to cause designers a lot of problems,” says Sturtevant. “If your henchman got stuck in Neverwinter Nights or even just fell too far behind, he would just teleport to catch up. I worked on the pathfinding system for Dragon Age, and I hope and expect that there won’t be such a problem there. Last year I got to hear Quinn Dunki [senior AI programmer at Pandemic Studios] talk about the pathfinding design in Saboteur, and they have a variety of animations they will play when an AI gets stuck, culminating with one of angry frustration. If your AI does get stuck, the human player will probably be much more forgiving if they can see that the AI knows it’s stuck.”

With inconsistent or inscrutable behavior currently anathema, it seems like current design paradigms naturally limit the kind of dynamism you can squeeze from an AI. As Polge says, “AI NPCs are still not as innovative as human players. Improving in this area, with the goal of really surprising players without frustrating them, is challenging, and less straightforward than the improvements we’ve made so far.”
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-27-2008, 04:19 PM
fable's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The sun, the moon, and the stars.
Posts: 28,419
"NPCs aren't as innovative as humans" because nobody's trying to do that, guy. You're confusing rules-set AI, which is almost entirely what one finds in games, with true learning AI, which you'll find in the best chess programs, or in Black-and-White's pets, or in the lamented Creatures series.

I don't know where the "inconsistent or inscrutable behavior currently anathema" comes from. This kind of behavior among NPCs has always been common, and still is, as Oblivion's ridiculous pseudo-activities and dialog prove.
__________________
To the Righteous belong the fruits of violent victory. The rest of us will have to settle for warm friends, warm lovers, and a wink from a quietly supportive universe.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


 
      Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
© 2000-2008 GameBanshee.com