| | | Advertisement |  | | | |  | GameBanshee Forums
| | 
09-17-2004, 07:57 AM
|  | Exalted Member | | Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Holland
Posts: 136
| | | Room 101 sickening up the forum Posting everywhere disgusting pictures of a woman ****ting herself, PLEASE BAN him, it is irrelevant and sickening | 
09-17-2004, 08:00 AM
|  | Super Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Denmark
Posts: 13,376
| | | Only Buck can ban people. (as of now).
And only the appointed moderators can do something in the assigned forums.
I know Room 101 is sick and posting stuff like that. He is angry he got banned some time ago and decided to take it out on "us" instead of accepting it.
Just ignore him using the ignore filter untill we can get this mess cleaned up. | 
09-17-2004, 08:03 AM
|  | Super Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Denmark
Posts: 13,376
| | | And ignore Giant turtle as well by the way. | 
09-17-2004, 11:02 AM
|  | Exalted Member | | Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: Soviet Canuckistan
Posts: 13,431
| | | Xandax and I have been working on a solution for this, so hopefully something can be done about the issue ASAP. | 
09-17-2004, 11:31 AM
|  | Exalted Member | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Connecticut, a place of open land, hills, forests, and crazy people.
Posts: 3,155
| | | Yes, this has gone too far! Do you still advise all mods to delete whatever threads he leaves in the other forums? | 
09-17-2004, 11:36 AM
|  | Super Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Denmark
Posts: 13,376
| | | Any new thread I see, I report if I can't delete it myself. | 
09-17-2004, 04:41 PM
|  | Exalted Member | | Join Date: May 2004 Location: Denmark
Posts: 157
| | | Of course only Buck can have the "power" to ban people. But it is not possible for one person to control the forum 24 hours every day.
Maybe all moderators could be allowed to delete in all forums, or maybe even to ban people temporary (fx 1-2 days) until Buck decide if the ban should be permanent or not?? | 
09-17-2004, 04:55 PM
|  | Site Owner/Administrator | | Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: The Nine Hells
Posts: 1,347
| | | What I've done for the time being is shut off the ability to insert pictures directly into a post. You can still upload attachments, but the BB code required to actually display a picture will no longer work. It doesn't entirely solve the problem, but at least it limits it to text only. | 
09-17-2004, 05:29 PM
| | Exalted Member | | Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 344
| | Neat..I actually asked Buck to stop pictures on here and he did!
I am your god!  | 
09-17-2004, 07:49 PM
|  | Exalted Member | | Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: Soviet Canuckistan
Posts: 13,431
| | | On a side note: I sent you a PM Buck about some stuff Xandax and I have discussed lately, summed up of course. | 
09-18-2004, 12:54 PM
|  | Moderator and Twisted Sister | | Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: The maelstrom where chaos merges with lucidity
Posts: 18,184
| | On a forum I administrate and moderate at the site owner has the final say when it comes to a permanent banning, but all co-admins have the power to temporarily ban a member in the event that there is a crisis of some kind and the owner is not about at the time.
We also have the ability to moderate the entire forum, even though each of us tends to spend more time in certain areas than in others.
I'm not certain such a system would work here, since the two sites are very different, but I wanted to at least make mention of it. 
__________________ testingtest12Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup. testingtest12.......All those moments ... will be lost ... in time ... like tears in rain. | 
09-19-2004, 12:09 AM
|  | Exalted Member | | Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: In the Sixth Door of the Chamber of Doors.
Posts: 258
| | | I really have no say in the matter, but I suggested several times the "global moderator" idea. No banning powers, not mini-admin, just global mod. The only power he's go is the ability to close and delete threads all across the board. The reason such a global mod may be effective is that, assuming he's got the time to spare, he can do a massive pruning of such things as the posts of *cough*LOclones*cough*. Let's face it; LO can post on every forum in GB. Why can't there be a mod that can reach him wherever he goes?
On a side note, we should hire moderators that are on a different timescale, say Asia or Europe. That way, we would have a "night shift" without really having a night shift. The Euro/Asian mods can moderate the forums during the "down" hours.
Deleting and closing posts, preventing pictures, that sort of thing ... they're really just temporary measures. What we NEED is a permanent solution; if neccessary we should ban LO's entire range of ISPs. Let's face it, what are a few users caught in that range, versus the entire rest of the board that are sickened by LO's immaturity? If I were caught in the range, I would gladly give up my right to post here if it means peace and quiet for the rest of you! I hope others feel the same way.
__________________
"Unlimited technology from all over the universe, and we cruise around in a Ford POS."
- Agent J, Men in Black Do you feel the Call? | 
09-19-2004, 01:19 AM
|  | Moderator and Twisted Sister | | Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: The maelstrom where chaos merges with lucidity
Posts: 18,184
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Opalescence I really have no say in the matter, but I suggested several times the "global moderator" idea. No banning powers, not mini-admin, just global mod. The only power he's go is the ability to close and delete threads all across the board. The reason such a global mod may be effective is that, assuming he's got the time to spare, he can do a massive pruning of such things as the posts of *cough*LOclones*cough*. Let's face it; LO can post on every forum in GB. Why can't there be a mod that can reach him wherever he goes?
On a side note, we should hire moderators that are on a different timescale, say Asia or Europe. That way, we would have a "night shift" without really having a night shift. The Euro/Asian mods can moderate the forums during the "down" hours.
Deleting and closing posts, preventing pictures, that sort of thing ... they're really just temporary measures. What we NEED is a permanent solution; if neccessary we should ban LO's entire range of ISPs. Let's face it, what are a few users caught in that range, versus the entire rest of the board that are sickened by LO's immaturity? If I were caught in the range, I would gladly give up my right to post here if it means peace and quiet for the rest of you! I hope others feel the same way. | Indeed, we really have no say in the matter, but for what it's worth.... I don't really think the idea of a single global mod is feasible since nobody will have the time to be about 24/7. This is why I suggested that all mods be granted the power to delete/close threads etc. across the board. I also don't think that giving mods the power to temporarily ban somebody is a bad idea, seeing as Buck can't be around all the time either, but clearly that is up to him
In fact, geography does factor into the way mods are chosen, especially in SYM. Xan is in Europe, Mah is in Asia and T'L is in the US. If all mods were to be given global powers than the various corners of the gobe would be covered fairly well.
I don't really think it is fair that LO's juvenile antics should prevent others in his IP range from joining the community. However, I do agree that a permanent measure is required... It are for reasons such as LO's stunts that ISPs sometimes discontinue service to clients... Perhaps this is in the realm of possibility????
__________________ testingtest12Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup. testingtest12.......All those moments ... will be lost ... in time ... like tears in rain. | 
09-19-2004, 01:47 AM
|  | Exalted Member | | Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: Soviet Canuckistan
Posts: 13,431
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by dragon wench It are for reasons such as LO's stunts that ISPs sometimes discontinue service to clients... Perhaps this is in the realm of possibility???? | Unfortuneatly, both Xandax and I have contacted his ISP, and (though, not sure on Xan's part) have gotten no response back. Range banning might be the only feasible option... | 
09-19-2004, 01:55 AM
|  | Twisted Sister | | Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Texas
Posts: 8,734
| | There is a certain efficiency to giving your mods and co-admins the ability to lock and move a thread to a shadow archive and teporarily ban someone pending further review when a serious infraction has occured.
Having a staff with a clear understanding of the expectations of the owner and clearly posted rules, along with carefully choosing people who share the owner's views and goals are essential to this working well.
I believe that Buck's staff are well equipped to exorcise those administrative powers with his authority.
__________________
Scayde Moody
(Pronounced Shayde) The virtue of self sacrifice is the lie perpetuated by the weak to enslave the strong | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | |