Register Lost Password?  Cookie?
  The time now is 10:58 PM GMT -6.  
Banshee Network
 
Quick Links
 
 
GameBanshee Swag
Site Features
Submit News
News Archives
Join Our Staff
Forums
Community Blogs
Reviews
Previews
Interviews
Editorials
About GB
Advertise With Us!
Advertisement
 
Go Back   GameBanshee Forums > Forum Categories > Traditional RPGs > Fallout 3

Reply
GameBanshee Forums  
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2008, 01:53 AM
WARLORD HECTOR's Avatar
Exalted Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Turkiye
Posts: 105
Fallout fans stay on the izometric perspektive sistem because, they enjoy the role playing much more then the shooting... A first person or 3 person (over the shoulder) game has the nature of being a action and busting (with what ever) game. Thats the problem.

As for me is was enough by fallout2 with the first person dialouges at special characters.

Fallout means to the old fans: Do what you want and accept it outcome.
__________________
Those who think about the outcome, could not be a hero...
P.ALEMDAR
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 07-25-2008, 09:11 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monolith View Post
In my opinion there is a major difference between a 2D top-down and a 3D first perspective game - especially if it's a RPG. The latter makes it easy to immerse. Therefore it is useful if one intends to make a dramatic game with serious content. The former allows the player to keep a certain distance to the game world. Therefore it is better for humorous content (now Running With Scissors' Postal 2 showed us that there are no restrictions and that even a 3D first-perspective game can be very humorous but that's a darn shooter).

For example, in Fallout 2 much of the dialog is out of topic. It's funny when a NPC tells the player character of the resemblance of many NPC (because there are not more than 15 NPC models or something). Now try to imagine that situation in a 3D first-person game - probably totally voiced out. It wouldn't happen. Bethsoft won't spent ca$h on garbage talk (especially when the dialog will be totally voiced out).

I think that Fallout 3 will be much more serious than Fallout 1 and 2. This doesn't necessarily mean that Fallout 3 will be a bad game. But it will be a different game. And the Fallout-Community loves Fallout. I wouldn't mind if they just made their own post-apocalyptic wasteland 3D first-perspective RPG and left the Fallout license to somebody else (Obsidian perchance?). But I have that feeling in my gut that they in fact are making their very own post-apocalyptic wasteland 3D first-perspective RPG - but still intend to name it Fallout 3.

About blood and gore:
Oblivion will be bloody -- but not nearly as bloody as Fallout is. Perhaps they will make a rather bloody Fallout 3. But that means a M rating. We'll see...

But before you think that I'm all against Beth's Fallout 3:
I'm not. I'm anticipating the game and I hope that it will be as much fun as Fallout 1 and 2 were and are.

i dont know about FO3 not being a funny game. bethesda has said time and again that it will have the dark humor of previous fallouts, game demoers at E3 said the same.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


 
      Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
© 2000-2008 GameBanshee.com