Quote:
Originally posted by tnn 2 very diffrent games...
If someone asked me wich game is more fun to play for a week I would say Fallout2. However after that week when you have completed the game there really isnt much more. Unlike Diablo 2, being crazy and pump one skill (like speech) is pointless, very pointless. Maybe you try making a kung fu type of guy, or a sniper. Could add some time of joy. Ive just played fo2 for a wek now but although Im having a great time(no..Fantastic!) I realize that it will shortly be over.
Diablo 2 on the other hand I played for 3 years, so they are veeery diffrent. I wouldnt call Diablo 2 an rpg even, cause it was just during the first week or so that the rpg elements was intense kinda. The other 150 weeks was purley character builds and item hunting.
<snip> |
Funny -it was the direct oppersite for me.
I tried Diablo 1 once - but after I found the leveldesign to be allmost identical (yeah yeah - I know it is random design, but .... it still felt like the same through the various levels and restarts - Daggerfall had a better random dungeon generator) and all the monsters were from a select few models just with a different name and color.
Multiplayer is the only thing Diablo 1 has that speaks for replay-value, otherwise it is so very tediously uniform
Fallout 2 on the otherhand I've replayed countless of times in my old days, trying new character types, solutions to problemes (blow this up, assassinate this character, find a cure for jet, become addicted to whatever, see if that extra toe actually does something bla bla bla).
F2 had so more debth, involvement and gameplay then diablo ever could get
But you are right - they are 2 different games, and I wouldn't classify Diablo as a RPG either

.
And I also think the reason Diablo beat F2 was alone due to the masses that play Diablo.
I can't see how they could even be compared in such a poll, though.