Register Lost Password?  Cookie?
  The time now is 01:33 PM GMT -6.  
Banshee Network
 
Quick Links
 
 
GameBanshee Swag
Site Features
Submit News
News Archives
Join Our Staff
Forums
Community Blogs
Reviews
Previews
Interviews
Editorials
About GB
Advertise With Us!
Advertisement
 
Go Back   GameBanshee Forums > Forum Categories > RPGs > Baldur's Gate III

Reply
GameBanshee Forums  
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2004, 10:49 AM
moltovir's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Out of Brynn's longbow range
Posts: 1,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRODTROD
Baldurs Gate is 2D, i simply wont buy BGIII if it is 3D, not a chance

TROD.
Damn, i've said it, and i will say it again: how the hell can you decide that a game is going to be überfantastic or pure ****, if it hasn't been released yet?? People who act like this, think they are the almighty god of the universe himself, always knowing everything from before and always thinking that they are 100% right. Right now the chance that you are going to play BG3 is 0,00%, because simply all games are 3D, even 2D looking games like Runaway: a road adventure or the crappy game with Daring Dirk and the Dragon. Wait and see, and don't cry or yell "this game is going to suck because it uses new technology" when they probably haven't even start working at it. If i were an employee at the firm that's going to develop it, i would probably start crying now because of all the distrust from the true fans.

I apologize for the possible rudeness in this post.
__________________
"We are at a very serious moment dealing with very serious issues and we are not focusing on the name you give to potatoes" - Nathalie Loisau (God Bless the Freedom Fries!)
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2004, 12:01 PM
Gwalchmai's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: This Quintessence of Dust
Posts: 6,233
Quote:
Originally Posted by moltovir
I apologize for the possible rudeness in this post.
As well you should. Try to dial it down a bit next time.


Still, your point is a good one. It is far too early to judge a game that isn't even in production yet.
__________________
That there; exactly the kinda diversion we coulda used.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 09-26-2004, 03:00 AM
ensaro dai's Avatar
Exalted Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Holland
Posts: 136
Send a message via MSN to ensaro dai
As long as BG III will have a great plot and characters outlined like the pervious series I'll be happy. + They shuld add more voice-overs for dialogs (comparing it with BG II ), more bantering and more romances I hope santa will listen to me and give me this x-mas gift
__________________
"In the Dark Ages they thought the earth was the centre of universe, in the modern ages they thinkthe sun was the centre of the universe, but in Fearun, Boo is the centre of the universe"
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2004, 04:44 PM
Aubrey's Avatar
Exalted Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 588
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xandax
I can only agree with this question. Why wouldn't it be BG3 if it is in 3D?

It wouldn't be BG3 if it were in first person view and real time and running around solo or with henchmen.
It would still be BG3 if done if the virtues of the ealier games were kept and it was now in 3D.

The graphics engine (2D or 3D) has nothing much to do with gamequality.
For me, it has. Although a game in 2d graphics seem to be passe these days, I enjoy it better than others. And this old-fashioned game engine looks --to me, in any case-- to be just the right one for a BG series. Personally, I didn't like NWN graphics at all. Not to mention the bad story, or the lack of it, or the allusions to Planescape:Torment and my numerous senses of deja-vu in the second expansion pack.

Call me a pessimist if you like, but as history goes I don't hold my expectations too high.
__________________
• "You cannot pass."..."I am a servant of the Secret Fire, Wielder of the Flame of Anor, You cannot pass. The dark fire will not avail you, Flame of Udun. Go Back to the Shadow! You cannot pass."
Gandalf the Grey
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 10-21-2004, 02:47 PM
Exalted Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 91
The Jefferson engine created by BIS, which was making the first BG3 and Fallout 3, was 3D and looked like the IE. It was pretty darn cool. 3D doesn’t mean it still can’t be in an isometric view with cool background graphics. That engine rocked!!

Here’s a screenshot of what was the former BG3, which is all 3D, background artwork and all.

http://avala.yubc.net/~svt/images/sc...ts/desktop.jpg

If BG3 was 3D like this I don't think many hard core fans would complain.

Last edited by Ellester; 10-21-2004 at 03:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2004, 04:23 AM
estaze's Avatar
Exalted Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Denmark
Posts: 91
No matter what the result of BG3 will be, i will buy it to the collection

Maybe you could make something like both isometric and 3D. Then you could move the camera around, and zoom etc.
But i think its good if Atari would listen to the users opinions and how they would like it to be. Of course the history is not supposed to be predictable or determined in that way.
__________________
<b></b>
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



 
      Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 2000-2008 GameBanshee.com