Quote:
|
^ Not really Siberys. The amazon and sorceress were part of all female clans that didn't accept men or teach them their ways. Diablo may allow us to play the male sorcerers of D1 and the female sorceresses of D2, but they would have different spells and spell systems. The amazon and barbarian are quite different as well. The amazons have a greek-phalanx type of combat and the barbarians have a teuton-berserker style of combat. I think there is a huge difference, especially in their magic. The amazon is empowered with greek-like magic, able to throw thunder bolts as though she were Zeus.
|
Yes, that may be historically accurate, but I was more or less meaning the basics of the class. Amazons are melee and potentially ranged weapon wielders, Barbarians are melee and potentially ranged weapon wielders, functionally there's not much difference since they use similar skills.
Not to mention, if they include a dexterity based class, they most certainly will include Rogue. Rogues and Amazons, in terms of the video game diablo, are even more similar than Barbarians and Amazons. They will likely put a lot of assassin skills into a "Bow" user of some sort.
Sorceress and Sorcerer, a full out elemental magic user is inevitable. The original five classes of Diablo 2 included Necromancer AND Sorceress. Witch doctor is essentially druid/necromancer, so why wouldn't they include another pure elemental based spellcaster? Where in the world are you drawing these conclusions from?
@fedenet89
Check your PM box please.