Quote:
Originally Posted by Siberys  Counter example, Gothic one was alright, Gothic 2 was a little better, Gothic 3 sucked. Elder Scrolls Arena was great, Elder Scrolls Daggerfall was great, Morrowind was Great, oblivion sucked.
Just because it has the name diablo 3 doesn't mean it's gonna be a good game. If blizzard or flagship studios makes it, they can make it crappy. |
First of all, the only Elder Scrolls I've played is Oblivion on 360 (which I'm currently playing again with my second hero, a mage,) and I think it's pretty damn good minus all the glitches and freezing I encounter... If you say the other games in the series are even better, I can't imagine what I'm missing out on.
Secondly, I've always been a Blizzard fan, from Warcraft 2 & 3/ Frozen Throne, along with Starcraft and Brood War as well as Diablo 1, 2, and LOD.
They've never failed to entertain so I have high hopes for a Diablo 3.
I think if they can buffer up their lackluster trademark Diablo story line as well as improve the combat engine / character personalization, they'll have another good seller.
The fact that Starcraft 2 isn't even out yet (and the fact that Ghost never even came out....... or did it?) leads me to believe that if there IS a Diablo 3 on the horizons, we will be waiting another year or two for it which means the game will only be that much more technologically advanced, and hopefully that much more of a quality product.
In my opinion, Blizzard is one of the most innovative game companies when it comes to the PC game world, and it seems that all of their sequels and expansions generally enhance the originals very nicely, therefore I pose the question:
Why would they make a Diablo 3 if they didn't think they could do it in a way that would completely blow Diablo 1 and Diablo 2 off the map?