View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-31-2007, 06:49 AM
Ulfang's Avatar
Ulfang Ulfang is offline
Exalted Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morecambe, UK
Posts: 140
Send a message via ICQ to Ulfang Send a message via MSN to Ulfang
Quote:
Originally Posted by DesR85 View Post
You judge a game based on how long it is? Why should a game with longer hours be much better than one which is short? It should be the game itself that is good rather than how long it is, in my honest opinion. As an example, both Call of Duty 1 & 2 are within the 12 hour mark, and yet, they're still good.

Nope I don't judge a game by it's length. As I said I enjoy the Halo series what I am saying is if you compare an FPS to a RPG then obviously the RPG is likely to be better value for money as it is going to entertain you longer. I'm not happy paying £50 for a Xbox360 FPS game that will keep me entertained for 8 hrs when I can spend half the price on a PC game that could keep me entertained for 80 hrs. That's just logic!

I see no reason why they can't make FPS games that last 20+ Hrs. You can finish most FPS games in a day these days that's just crazy! Someone I know finished Jericho in seven hrs ... that's less time than my working day!
Reply With Quote