Quote:
Originally Posted by Kipi  Sorry, but I wouldn't compare Fallout: Tactics and Fallout 1&2 to each other, as those are very different kind of games, and they were meant such. FO:T was turn-based, squad strategy game, with hints of RPG situated in Fallout -world. It wasn't meant to be like two original Fallouts, it was meant to be squad based strategy game. And it did very good job in being such game.
So, I wouldn't count Tactics as a disaster just because it wasn't like 1&2... 
About F3 being disaster, well... if Bethesda stays on it's latest style, it will be IMO disaster...  |
Agree 100%.
Fallout Tactics was a good game, if you did not play it because you wanted Fallout 3. FO 1+2 are different game genres from FO:T, so comparing them is pretty useless, save them using the same "story".
It would be like comparing World of Warcraft with Warcraft, Warcraft II and III. Not useful nor serious.
And I doubt Fallout 3 will be a Fallout game. It will just be called Fallout and use some of the setting, that's it. Bethesda can't make quality games anymore. (Quality of course being subjective as I know a lot of people apparently liked Oblivion and dumped down gameplay)
The piece which convinced me most was that it'll be developed for consoles as well, and that generally means crappy controls.