Thread: game
View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2007, 03:04 PM
Balder Balder is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5
I saw in the sticky that their planning on 40-50 hours of gameplay, I think that sounds dissapointing. Why not charge more money for games that youve put more hours into.

Nowadays most games are short, cheap to buy and rushed, I would easily pay 150 dollars for a game and then knowing that they have put a lot of time and thinking into the game, and not rushed the game.

40-50 hours of gameplay isn't all that much, look at BG 2 you get far more attached to a game when you play it for 300 hours not 40, and yes I know you can finish BG 2 more quickly, but if you do all the sidequests and don't check any walkthroughs I guarantee it will take you some time.

I guess all I'm trying to say is instead of paying 50$ for a game then 30$ each, for 3 poorly made expansions, I would rather pay a larger sum for more quality in a game. And let the game take it's time the more hours they put in to DA, the better it will get.
Reply With Quote