Quote: |
Originally Posted by Fiona It is not you, Rookie, tis a natural law
Reporting: Summary
The Clark-Trimble experiments
A convenient point of departure is provided by the famous Clark-Trimble experiments of 1935. Clark-Trimble was not primarily a physicist, and his great discovery of the Graduated Hostility of Things was made almost accidentally. During some research into the relation between periods of the day and human bad temper, Clark-Trimble, a leading Cambridge psychologist, came to the conclusion that low human dynamics in the early morning could not sufficiently explain the apparent hostility of Things at the breakfast table - the way honey gets between the fingers, the unfoldability of news-papers, etc. In the experiments which finally confirmed him in this view, and which he demonstrated before the Royal Society in London, Clark-Trimble arranged four hundred pieces of carpet in ascending degrees of quality, from coarse matting to priceless Chinese silk. Pieces of toast and marmalade, graded, weighed, and measured, were then dropped on each piece of carpet, and the marmalade-downwards incidence was statistically analysed. The toast fell right-side-up every time on the cheap carpet, except when the cheap carpet was screened from the rest (in which case the toast didn’t know that Clark-Trimble had other and better carpets), and it fell marmalade-downwards every time on the Chinese silk. Most remarkable of all, the marmalade-downwards incidence for the intermediate grades was found to vary exactly with the quality of carpet.
The success of these experiments naturally switched Clark-Trimble’s attention to further research on resistentia, a fact which was directly responsible for the tragic and sudden end to his career when he trod on a garden rake at the Cambridge School of Agronomy. In the meantime, Noys and Crangenbacker had been doing some notable work in America. Noys carried out literally thousands of experiments, in which subjects of all ages and sexes, sitting in chairs of every conceivable kind, dropped various kinds of pencils. In only three cases did the pencil come to rest within easy reach. Crangenbacker’s work in the social-industrial field, on the relation of human willpower to specific problems such as whether a train or subway will stop with the door opposite you on a crowded platform, or whether there will be a mail box anywhere on your side of the street, was attracting much attention.
(From 'Report on Resistentialism' by Paul Jennings) | Ah, Moore's Law and its numerous siblings.
Now I can feel better about breaking the bank to fix my MP3 player. Quote: |
Originally Posted by Darzog I'm pretty much the exact opposite. My technology-gadgets last forever.
My first tape player, from back in middle school (about 18 years ago) was this neat little AIWA player that did both sides without flipping the tape, AM/FM radio, 3 equalizer settings, and barely bigger than the cassette itself. I found it a couple months ago when we were cleaning up, it still works fine and only has a small chip in one corner even though I took it to school with me every day in middle school and high school. Ended up going into the Good Will pile.
My stereo from high school (got it about 15 years ago) had a dual tape deck, record table, radio, separate speakers. Worked just fine until we ended up putting it in the Good Will pile about a year ago (got a new stereo for the living room which bumped that to the office which bumped my ol' stand-by).
My current 4 watches (300m water-resist for scuba diving, 200m water-resist for general sports, nice simple for work, dressy engagement present for dressing up) have lived for 7, 7, 9, 8 years respectively with only battery changes and 1 band replacement. All still work great, one other may need another band soon.
My current PC is sitting at home, 2 years old or so. Previous one (was 4 years old when I stopped using it) is sitting right next to it, just haven't made the effort of finding it a new home but it still works, boots up, etc. The one previous to that which I originally got in '97 lasted for 3 years before I replaced it. No components have required replacement but I have upgraded hard drives, memory, CD/DVD drives/burners, graphics cards, monitors, etc.
In general, almost all of my electronics last and I end up buying newer ones just because I want one and not because I have to. Maybe if my PC broke though I could convince my wife that we need a new/better one.  | Invite me to your house for a month, and you'll have all the excuses you need |