| So, ignoring Bishop Vick as simply a madman (madvampire?) we have left a rather motley collection of individuals,and the question that springs to mind is whether they are a group at all? Would Damsal and Isaac ever agree to work together really?
Possibly more importantly, who defines the Anarchs? Do they (please excuse the terrible jargon) "self-define" as Anarchs, or do they merely see themselves as not Camarilla/Sabbatt? Is is the Camarilla which defines them as "Anarchs", in which case the idea of them as anarchists in the sense of "Satanists" is much more accurate: the Camarilla see their rules as the only means by which vampires can survive, and vampires existing outside of these rules are simply undermining society (and security) for no purpose. Of course the most accurate answer is probably that originally it was the Camarilla which so defined the anarchs, but that they now use it as a badge of honour and a label themselves (suggesting that however much they protest, they still think like the Camarilla...).  |