| Ranger/Cleric Vs. Fighter/Cleric ???Dual/Multi???
As far as I can see the good thing about the Ranger/Cleric multi is the extra attack (when no shield in use) and the druid spells (unlike BG2 you have to 'unlock' these spells as you level up in Ranger) added to cleric spellbook. The extra attack just gives flexibility by the end as you probably want +4AC from a strong shield. The stealth I wouldn't use as you lose too much AC.
Ranger -> Cleric Dual, same as above though I don't know which is better???
Fighter/Cleric Multi ??? Is this good ??? No grandmastery is a problem seeing as you're part fighter, but the THACO would be higher than the below option (unless you waited forever to dual class).
Fighter -> Cleric Dual, this seems good to me if you get Grandmastery in something. Now you get the same # attacks as the Ranger 'dual wield' but you can hold a shield. Or is GM nerfed from BG1?
What do people think? I definately want a warrior cleric but I don't know what to choose.
myrophine |