Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nightmare Why won't it be BG3 if its 3D? The FF series had this change, the Legend of Zelda series had this change. |
Ok, somehow FF pulled it off, but 3D ruined Zelda, it changed the whole game.
It was no longer Zelda, the incredibly difficult (the gameboy last level was near impossible) puzzle game, with a hint of fighting. It became some user friendly pretty peice of crap where you just went around slashing things.
The perspectives changed the whole way the puzzles worked, in short the series was ruined.
"Now I can say without hesitation that this game does not need any changing in the views or the landscape, because quite frankly, it's like your walking through a masterpiece when you play this game."
Crownhead just said it best.
You serverely risk ruining the game, and over what, small possible graphical inhancements.
"How about a more intelligent petition, like one for story or combat? They're trying to choose between Turn-based and Real-time, why isn't anyone arguing that? How about a petition to ask the inclusion of people who know what they're doing, like makers of PS:T or the original BG games? The game is, after all, for the players. How about a petition asking for a different name"
Well do it then, I think it would be great, and would sign all (apart from the good story one, thats just stupid, its like sending a petition saying "make the game great"... its worthless) If they make it turnbased it will be stupid, it will ruin the game, BG combat needs to be realtime with pause option.