Well this is a bit intellectually dishonest, isn't it, seeing how we're quoting less than half the article. Plus if you look at what's quoted you'll see that it's the introduction, the conclusion, and a bit in-between just to give people a good taste of the main meat of the article and entice them to check it out (not to mention all the images and whatnot).But hey, I'm not here to argue semantics as, like I've said, the idea is to get people to check out your full article, which is quite great. Edited to only the intro. Cheers.